Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Midline Carcinoma of Children and Young Adults With NUT Rearrangement

Open access
French, Christopher A., Kutok, Jeffery L., Faquin, William C., Toretsky, Jeffrey A., Antonescu, Cristina R., Griffin, Constance A., Nose, Vania, Vargas, Sara O., Moschovi, Mary, Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou, Fotini, Miyoshi, Isao, Perez-Atayde, Antonio R., Aster, Jon C., Fletcher, Jonathan A.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: A balanced chromosomal translocation, t(15;19), resulting in the BRD4-NUT oncogene, has been identified in a lethal carcinoma of young people, a disease described primarily in case reports. We sought to amass a more definitive series of tumors with NUT and/or BRD4 gene rearrangements and to determine distinct clinicopathologic features. Patients and Methods: Carcinomas (N = 98) in young individuals (median age, 32.5 years) were screened for NUT and BRD4 rearrangements using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Four published carcinomas with BRD4 and NUT rearrangements were also evaluated. Immunophenotypic analyses were performed. Results: Eleven tumors had NUT gene rearrangements, including eight with BRD4-NUT fusions and three with novel rearrangements, which were designated as NUT variant. All NUT-rearranged carcinomas (NRCs) arose from midline epithelial structures, including the first example arising below the diaphragm. Patients were young (median age, 17.6 years). Squamous differentiation (seen in 82% of NRCs) was particularly striking in NUT-variant cases. In this first description of NUT-variant carcinomas, the average survival (96 weeks, n = 3) was longer than for BRD4-NUT carcinomas (28 weeks, n = 8). Strong CD34 expression was found in six of 11 NRCs but in zero of 45 NUT wild-type carcinomas. Conclusion: NRCs arise from midline structures in young people, and NRCs with BRD4-NUT are highly lethal, despite intensive therapies. NUT-variant carcinomas might have a less fulminant clinical course than those with BRD4-NUT fusions. CD34 expression is characteristic in NRCs and, therefore, holds promise as a diagnostic test for this distinctive clinicopathologic entity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.02.107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
French, C. A., Kutok, J. L., Faquin, W. C., Toretsky, J. A., Antonescu, C. R., Griffin, C. A., Nose, V., Vargas, S. O., Moschovi, M., Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou, F., Miyoshi, I., Perez-Atayde, A. R., Aster, J. C., & Fletcher, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-10-15
Volume
22
Issue
20
Pages
4135-4139
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2169944837
Cited by
410
References
0
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Midline Carcinoma of Children and Young Adults With NUT Rearrangement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.02.107
The paper
French, C. A., Kutok, J. L., Faquin, W. C., Toretsky, J. A., Antonescu, C. R., Griffin, C. A., Nose, V., Vargas, S. O., Moschovi, M., Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou, F., Miyoshi, I., Perez-Atayde, A. R., Aster, J. C., & Fletcher, J. A. (2004). Midline Carcinoma of Children and Young Adults With NUT Rearrangement. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.02.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.