Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,716

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gefitinib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial—INTACT 1

Open access
Giaccone, Giuseppe, Herbst, Roy S., Manegold, Christian, Scagliotti, Giorgio, Rosell, Rafael, Miller, Vincent, Natale, Ronald B., Schiller, Joan H., von Pawel, Joachim, Pluzanska, Anna, Gatzemeier, Ulrich, Grous, John, Ochs, Judith S., Averbuch, Steven D., Wolf, Michael K., Rennie, Pamela, Fandi, Abderrahim, Johnson, David H.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) to standard first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin provides clinical benefit over gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in advanced NSCLC in phase II trials in pretreated patients, and a phase I trial of gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin showed favorable tolerability. Patients and Methods: This was a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable stage III or IV NSCLC. All patients received up to six cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 of the 3-week cycle) plus either gefitinib 500 mg/d, gefitinib 250 mg/d, or placebo. Daily gefitinib or placebo was continued until disease progression. End points included overall survival (primary), time to progression, response rates, and safety evaluation. Results: A total of 1,093 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in efficacy end points between the treatment groups: for the gefitinib 500 mg/d, gefitinib 250 mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively, median survival times were 9.9, 9.9, and 10.9 months (global ordered log-rank [GOLrank] P = .4560), median times to progression were 5.5, 5.8, and 6.0 months (GOLrank; P = .7633), and response rates were 49.7%, 50.3%, and 44.8%. No significant unexpected adverse events were seen. Conclusion: Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC did not have improved efficacy over gemcitabine and cisplatin alone. The reasons for this remain obscure and require further preclinical testing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,716

Metadata

Authors
Giaccone, G., Herbst, R. S., Manegold, C., Scagliotti, G., Rosell, R., Miller, V., Natale, R. B., Schiller, J. H., von Pawel, J., Pluzanska, A., Gatzemeier, U., Grous, J., Ochs, J. S., Averbuch, S. D., Wolf, M. K., Rennie, P., Fandi, A., & Johnson, D. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
777-784
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110835998
Cited by
1,716
References
3
FWCI
159.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gefitinib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial—INTACT 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.001
The paper
Giaccone, G., Herbst, R. S., Manegold, C., Scagliotti, G., Rosell, R., Miller, V., Natale, R. B., Schiller, J. H., von Pawel, J., Pluzanska, A., Gatzemeier, U., Grous, J., Ochs, J. S., Averbuch, S. D., Wolf, M. K., Rennie, P., Fandi, A., & Johnson, D. H. (2004). Gefitinib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial—INTACT 1. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.