Cited by 1,111Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

Open access
Ciuleanu, Tudor, Brodowicz, Thomas, Zielinski, Christoph, Kim, Joo Hang, Krzakowski, Maciej, Laack, Eckart, Wu, Yi-Long, Bover, Isabel +11 more·2009·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease.Methods This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.Findings All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001).Interpretation Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Funding Eli Lilly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61497-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ciuleanu, T., Brodowicz, T., Zielinski, C., Kim, J. H., Krzakowski, M., Laack, E., Wu, Y.-L., Bover, I., Begbie, S., Tzekova, V., Cucevic, B., Pereira, J. R., Yang, S. H., Madhavan, J., Sugarman, K. P., Peterson, P., John, W. J., Krejcy, K., & Belani, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
  • Vienna General Hospital (AT)
  • Yonsei Cancer Hospital (KR)
  • Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (AT)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Guangdong General Hospital (CN)
  • Hospital Son Llatzer (ES)
  • Queen Giovanna Hospital (BG)
  • Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram (IN)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Penn State Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Belani, Chandra P
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
374
Issue
9699
Pages
1432-1440
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2112621029
Cited by
1,111
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 141
FWCI
116.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
pemetrexed, maintenance therapy, non-small cell lung cancer, best supportive care, progression-free survival, overall survival, platinum-based chemotherapy, antifolate, drug toxicity, neutropenia, fatigue, vitamin B12, folic acid, dexamethasone, advanced lung cancer, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Pemetrexed, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Double-Blind Method, Fatigue, Female, Glutamates, Guanine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Neutropenia, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review