Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Failure of Higher-Dose Paclitaxel to Improve Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9342

Open access
Winer, Eric P., Berry, Donald A., Woolf, Susan, Duggan, David, Kornblith, Alice, Harris, Lyndsay N., Michaelson, Richard A., Kirshner, Jeffrey A., Fleming, Gini F., Perry, Michael C., Graham, Mark L., Sharp, Stewart A., Keresztes, Roger, Henderson, I. Craig, Hudis, Clifford, Muss, Hyman, Norton, Larry·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens—175 mg/m 2, 210 mg/m 2, or 250 mg/m 2—each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment. Results: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P = .04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms. Conclusion: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m 2 should be considered the optimal dose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Winer, E. P., Berry, D. A., Woolf, S., Duggan, D., Kornblith, A., Harris, L. N., Michaelson, R. A., Kirshner, J. A., Fleming, G. F., Perry, M. C., Graham, M. L., Sharp, S. A., Keresztes, R., Henderson, I. C., Hudis, C., Muss, H., & Norton, L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
2061-2068
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2143989581
Cited by
270
References
1
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Failure of Higher-Dose Paclitaxel to Improve Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9342. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.048
The paper
Winer, E. P., Berry, D. A., Woolf, S., Duggan, D., Kornblith, A., Harris, L. N., Michaelson, R. A., Kirshner, J. A., Fleming, G. F., Perry, M. C., Graham, M. L., Sharp, S. A., Keresztes, R., Henderson, I. C., Hudis, C., Muss, H., & Norton, L. (2004). Failure of Higher-Dose Paclitaxel to Improve Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9342. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.