The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review of Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
Abstract
Purpose: A number of studies have investigated the relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. Although many have reported a better survival with MSI, estimates of the hazard ratio (HR) among studies differ. To derive a more precise estimate of the prognostic significance of MSI, we have reviewed and pooled data from published studies. Methods: Studies stratifying survival in CRC patients by MSI status were eligible for analysis. The principal outcome measure was the HR. Data from eligible studies were pooled using standard techniques. Results: Thirty-two eligible studies reported survival in a total of 7,642 cases, including 1,277 with MSI. There was no evidence of publication bias. The combined HR estimate for overall survival associated with MSI was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.71; heterogeneity P = .16; I 2 = 20%). This benefit was maintained restricting analyses to clinical trial patients (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.85) and patients with locally advanced CRC (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78). In patients treated with adjuvant fluorouracil (FU) CRCs with MSI had a better prognosis (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.84). However, while data are limited, tumors with MSI derived no benefit from adjuvant FU (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.14). Conclusion: CRCs with MSI have a significantly better prognosis compared to those with intact mismatch repair. Additional studies are needed to further define the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced tumors with MSI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Ribic, C. M., Sargent, D. J., Moore, M. J., Thibodeau, S. N., French, A. J., Goldberg, R. M., Hamilton, S. R., Laurent-Puig, P., Gryfe, R., Shepherd, L. E., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022289 · Cited by 2,160
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer
(1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450110090034 · Cited by 1,086
Guidoboni, M., Gafà, R., Viel, A., Doglioni, C., Russo, A., Santini, A., Del Tin, L., Macrì, E., Lanza, G., Boiocchi, M., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61695-1 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer
Boland, C. R., & Goel, A. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.064 · Cited by 2,456
The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution
Burrell, R. A., McGranahan, N., Bartek, J., & Swanton, C. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12625 · Cited by 2,262
Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: Rationale, challenges and potential
Ganesh, K., Stadler, Z. K., Cercek, A., Mendelsohn, R. B., Shia, J., Segal, N. H., & Diaz, L. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0126-x · Cited by 1,954
Sargent, D. J., Marsoni, S., Monges, G., Thibodeau, S. N., Labianca, R., Hamilton, S. R., French, A. J., Kabat, B., Foster, N. R., Torri, V., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.1825 · Cited by 1,623
Marisa, L., de Reyniès, A., Duval, A., Selves, J., Gaub, M. P., Vescovo, L., Etienne-Grimaldi, M.-C., Schiappa, R., Guenot, D., Ayadi, M., et al. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001453 · Cited by 1,507
Metadata
- Authors
- Popat, S., Hubner, R., & Houlston, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-01-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 609-618
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2123636561
- Cited by
- 1,830
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review of Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.01.086
- The paper
- Popat, S., Hubner, R., & Houlston, R. S. (2005). Systematic Review of Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.