Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morbidity After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Purushotham, Anand David, Upponi, Sara, Klevesath, Manfred Borislav, Bobrow, Lynda, Millar, Keith, Myles, Jonathan Peter, Duffy, Stephen William·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as part of surgical treatment for patients with breast cancer is associated with significant morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a newly developed method of staging the axilla and has the potential to avoid an ALND in lymph node–negative patients, thereby minimizing morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate physical and psychological morbidity after SLNB in the treatment of early breast cancer in a randomized controlled trial. Patients and Methods: Between November 1999 and February 2003, 298 patients with early breast cancer (tumors 3 cm or less on ultrasound examination) who were clinically node negative were randomly allocated to undergo ALND (control group) or SLNB followed by ALND if subsequently found to be lymph node positive (study group). A detailed assessment of physical and psychological morbidity was performed during a 1-year period postoperatively. Results: A significant reduction in postoperative arm swelling, rate of seroma formation, numbness, loss of sensitivity to light touch and pinprick was observed in the study group. Although shoulder mobility was less impaired on average in the study group, this was significant only for abduction at 1 month and flexion at 3 months. Scores reflecting quality of life and psychological morbidity were significantly better in the study group in the immediate postoperative period, with fewer long-term differences. Conclusion: SLNB in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer results in a significant reduction in physical and psychological morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.03.228

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Purushotham, A. D., Upponi, S., Klevesath, M. B., Bobrow, L., Millar, K., Myles, J. P., & Duffy, S. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
23
Issue
19
Pages
4312-4321
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2154806076
Cited by
523
References
5
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morbidity After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.03.228
The paper
Purushotham, A. D., Upponi, S., Klevesath, M. B., Bobrow, L., Millar, K., Myles, J. P., & Duffy, S. W. (2005). Morbidity After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.