The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Paclitaxel After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From NSABP B-28
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aim of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 was to determine whether four cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel (PTX) after four cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) will prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with four cycles of AC alone in patients with resected operable breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes. Patients and Methods: Between August 1995 and May 1998, 3,060 patients were randomly assigned (AC, 1,529; AC followed by PTX [AC → PTX], 1,531). Patients ≥ 50 years and those younger than 50 years with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) -positive tumors also received tamoxifen for 5 years, starting with the first dose of AC. Postlumpectomy radiotherapy was mandated. Postmastectomy or regional radiotherapy was prohibited. Median follow-up is 64.6 months. Results: The addition of PTX to AC significantly reduced the hazard for DFS event by 17% (relative risk [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .006). Five-year DFS was 76% ± 2% for patients randomly assigned to AC → PTX compared with 72% ± 2% for those randomly assigned to AC. Improvement in OS was small and not statistically significant (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = .46). Five-year OS was 85% ± 2% for both groups. Subset analysis of the effect of paclitaxel according to hormone receptors or tamoxifen administration did not reveal statistically significant interaction (for DFS, P = .30 and P = .44, respectively). Toxicity with the AC → PTX regimen was acceptable for the adjuvant setting. Conclusion: The addition of PTX to AC resulted in significant improvement in DFS but no significant improvement in OS with acceptable toxicity. No significant interaction between treatment effect and receptor status or tamoxifen administration was observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cyclophosphamide and cancer: golden anniversary
Emadi, A., Jones, R. J., & Brodsky, R. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.146 · Cited by 1,050
Anderson, B. O., Shyyan, R., Eniu, A., Smith, R. A., Yip, C.-H., Bese, N. S., Chow, L. W. C., Masood, S., Ramsey, S. D., & Carlson, R. W. (2006) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1075-122x.2006.00199.x · Cited by 359
Predictive factors for response to docetaxel in human breast cancers
Noguchi, S. (2006) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00265.x · Cited by 127
RCT of a psychological intervention for patients with cancer: I. Mechanisms of change.
Andersen, B. L., Shelby, R. A., & Golden-Kreutz, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.75.6.927 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Mamounas, E. P., Bryant, J., Lembersky, B., Fehrenbacher, L., Sedlacek, S. M., Fisher, B., Wickerham, D. L., Yothers, G., Soran, A., & Wolmark, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3686-3696
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2098333537
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paclitaxel After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From NSABP B-28. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.10.517
- The paper
- Mamounas, E. P., Bryant, J., Lembersky, B., Fehrenbacher, L., Sedlacek, S. M., Fisher, B., Wickerham, D. L., Yothers, G., Soran, A., & Wolmark, N. (2005). Paclitaxel After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From NSABP B-28. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.10.517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.