Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab

Open access
Curran, Desmond, Giralt, Jordi, Harari, Paul M., Ang, K. Kian, Cohen, Roger B., Kies, Merrill S., Jassem, Jacek, Baselga, José, Rowinsky, Eric K., Amellal, Nadia, Comte, Sylvie, Bonner, James A.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: In this randomized, phase III study, quality of life (QoL) was assessed in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) after high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III or IV nonmetastatic and measurable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were eligible. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Cancer–Specific Module at baseline, week 4, and at months 4, 8, and 12 postbaseline. Results: In this study, one of the largest conducted in a population of patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN, 424 patients received radiotherapy alone (213 patients) or radiotherapy plus cetuximab (211 patients). Radiotherapy/cetuximab significantly improved locoregional control (P = .005) and overall survival (P = .03) compared with radiotherapy alone, without significantly increasing radiotherapy-associated adverse events. The current analysis focused on the impact of cetuximab on the QoL. Compliance with completion of QoL questionnaires was high in both arms. QoL worsened during treatment and improved after cessation of treatment, reaching baseline levels at 12 months. There were no significant differences in QoL scores between the treatment arms. This was particularly notable for global health status/QoL, social functioning, social eating, and social contact. Pretreatment global health status/QoL was identified as a significant prognostic variable in these patients. Conclusion: The addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy significantly improved locoregional control and increased overall survival without adversely affecting QoL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.08.8005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Curran, D., Giralt, J., Harari, P. M., Ang, K. K., Cohen, R. B., Kies, M. S., Jassem, J., Baselga, J., Rowinsky, E. K., Amellal, N., Comte, S., & Bonner, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
16
Pages
2191-2197
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2075981888
Cited by
247
References
2
FWCI
26.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.8005
The paper
Curran, D., Giralt, J., Harari, P. M., Ang, K. K., Cohen, R. B., Kies, M. S., Jassem, J., Baselga, J., Rowinsky, E. K., Amellal, N., Comte, S., & Bonner, J. A. (2007). Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.8005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.