The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: In this randomized, phase III study, quality of life (QoL) was assessed in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) after high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III or IV nonmetastatic and measurable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were eligible. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Cancer–Specific Module at baseline, week 4, and at months 4, 8, and 12 postbaseline. Results: In this study, one of the largest conducted in a population of patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN, 424 patients received radiotherapy alone (213 patients) or radiotherapy plus cetuximab (211 patients). Radiotherapy/cetuximab significantly improved locoregional control (P = .005) and overall survival (P = .03) compared with radiotherapy alone, without significantly increasing radiotherapy-associated adverse events. The current analysis focused on the impact of cetuximab on the QoL. Compliance with completion of QoL questionnaires was high in both arms. QoL worsened during treatment and improved after cessation of treatment, reaching baseline levels at 12 months. There were no significant differences in QoL scores between the treatment arms. This was particularly notable for global health status/QoL, social functioning, social eating, and social contact. Pretreatment global health status/QoL was identified as a significant prognostic variable in these patients. Conclusion: The addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy significantly improved locoregional control and increased overall survival without adversely affecting QoL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vickery, L. E., Latchford, G., Hewison, J., Bellew, M., & Feber, T. (2003) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.10206 · Cited by 201
Sociodemographic factors and quality of life as prognostic indicators in head and neck cancer
de Graeff, A., de Leeuw, J. R. J., Ros, W. J. G., Hordijk, G. J., Blijham, G. H., & Winnubst, J. A. M. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00385-3 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Peng, G., Wang, T., Yang, K.-Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Li, Q., Han, J., & Wu, G. (2012) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013 · Cited by 624
Smith, J. D., Shuman, A. G., & Riba, M. B. (2017) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0811-9 · Cited by 81
Bauml, J., Kim, J., Zhang, X., Aggarwal, C., Cohen, R. B., & Schmitz, K. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0604-5 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, D., Giralt, J., Harari, P. M., Ang, K. K., Cohen, R. B., Kies, M. S., Jassem, J., Baselga, J., Rowinsky, E. K., Amellal, N., Comte, S., & Bonner, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2191-2197
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2075981888
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.8005
- The paper
- Curran, D., Giralt, J., Harari, P. M., Ang, K. K., Cohen, R. B., Kies, M. S., Jassem, J., Baselga, J., Rowinsky, E. K., Amellal, N., Comte, S., & Bonner, J. A. (2007). Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Treatment With High-Dose Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.8005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.