Cited by 199Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCancer survivorship and careInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Sociodemographic factors and quality of life as prognostic indicators in head and neck cancer

de Graeff, A, de Leeuw, J.R.J, Ros, W.J.G, Hordijk, G.J, Blijham, G.H, Winnubst, J.A.M·2001·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Pre-treatment quality of life (QOL) has been found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients, in particular in patients with advanced cancer. Sociodemographic factors such as marital and socioeconomic status have also been recognised as prognostic factors. We studied the influence of QOL and mood (measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)) as measured before treatment, the use of cigarettes and alcohol and sociodemographic factors (age, gender, marital status, income and occupation) on recurrence and survival in 208 patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Cognitive functioning and, to a lesser degree, marital status were independent predictors of recurrence and survival, along with medical factors (stage and radicality). Patients with less than optimal cognitive functioning and unmarried patients had a relative risk (RR) of recurrence of 1.72 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-2.93) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.06-3.33), respectively, and a RR of dying of 1.90 (95% CI 1.10-3.26) and 1.82 (95% CI 1.03-3.23), respectively. Performance status, physical functioning, mood and global QOL and smoking and drinking did not predict for recurrence and survival. The influence of cognitive functioning might be related to the use of alcohol. Marital status may influence prognosis through mechanisms of health behaviour and/or social support mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00385-3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Graeff, A., de Leeuw, J. R. J., Ros, W. J. G., Hordijk, G. J., Blijham, G. H., & Winnubst, J. A. M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
332-339
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080391410
Cited by
199
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
head and neck cancer, quality of life, prognostic factors, recurrence, survival, sociodemographic factors, marital status, cognitive function, mood, depression, smoking, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, EORTC QLQ-H&N35, EORTC QLQ-C30, social support
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review