Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 482

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adherence to Initial Adjuvant Anastrozole Therapy Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Partridge, Ann H., LaFountain, Andrea, Mayer, Erica, Taylor, Brooke S., Winer, Eric, Asnis-Alibozek, Aviva·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Previous research evaluating adherence to tamoxifen therapy among women with early-stage breast cancer has revealed adherence estimates ranging from 25% to 96%. No previous studies have focused on adherence to adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Methods: We used longitudinal claims data from three large commercial health programs to estimate adherence with anastrozole therapy among women with early-stage breast cancer. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days that patients had medication available over the observation period (ie, days covered); women with fewer than 80% of days covered were defined as nonadherent. Results: More than 12,000 women in the databases were found to have new anastrozole prescription claims during the period of study: 1,498 women were classified as having early-stage disease in one commercial health program (Plan A) data set, 1,899 women in another program (Plan B) data set, and 8,994 women in MarketScan, a commercial data set made up of several health programs. Mean adherence over the first 12 months of therapy ranged from 82% to 88% in the three data sets. Between 19% and 28% of women had fewer than 80% of days covered. For women with 36 months of continuous eligibility, the mean adherence decreased each year, ranging from 78% to 86% in year 1 to 62% to 79% in year 3 within the three data sets. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of women with early-stage breast cancer may be suboptimally adherent to adjuvant anastrozole therapy. Future research should focus on the identification of patients at risk for nonadherence with oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer and the development of interventions to improve adherence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.11.5451

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 482

Metadata

Authors
Partridge, A. H., LaFountain, A., Mayer, E., Taylor, B. S., Winer, E., & Asnis-Alibozek, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
556-562
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2154734961
Cited by
482
References
36
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence to Initial Adjuvant Anastrozole Therapy Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.11.5451
The paper
Partridge, A. H., LaFountain, A., Mayer, E., Taylor, B. S., Winer, E., & Asnis-Alibozek, A. (2008). Adherence to Initial Adjuvant Anastrozole Therapy Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.11.5451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.