The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Because current approaches to risk classification and treatment stratification for children with neuroblastoma (NB) vary greatly throughout the world, it is difficult to directly compare risk-based clinical trials. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification. Patients and Methods: The statistical and clinical significance of 13 potential prognostic factors were analyzed in a cohort of 8,800 children diagnosed with NB between 1990 and 2002 from North America and Australia (Children's Oncology Group), Europe (International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group and German Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Group), and Japan. Survival tree regression analyses using event-free survival (EFS) as the primary end point were performed to test the prognostic significance of the 13 factors. Results: Stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumor differentiation, the status of the MYCN oncogene, chromosome 11q status, and DNA ploidy were the most highly statistically significant and clinically relevant factors. A new staging system (INRG Staging System) based on clinical criteria and tumor imaging was developed for the INRG Classification System. The optimal age cutoff was determined to be between 15 and 19 months, and 18 months was selected for the classification system. Sixteen pretreatment groups were defined on the basis of clinical criteria and statistically significantly different EFS of the cohort stratified by the INRG criteria. Patients with 5-year EFS more than 85%, more than 75% to ≤ 85%, ≥ 50% to ≤ 75%, or less than 50% were classified as very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk, respectively. Conclusion: By defining homogenous pretreatment patient cohorts, the INRG classification system will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world and the development of international collaborative studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Molecular targeting therapies for neuroblastoma: Progress and challenges
Zafar, A., Wang, W., Liu, G., Wang, X., Xian, W., McKeon, F., Foster, J., Zhou, J., & Zhang, R. (2021) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21750 · Cited by 380
Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D., Villablanca, J. G., Berthold, F., Burchill, S., Boubaker, A., McHugh, K., Nuchtern, J. G., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177 · Cited by 365
Self-citationChallagundla, K. B., Wise, P. M., Neviani, P., Chava, H., Murtadha, M., Xu, T., Kennedy, R., Ivan, C., Zhang, X., Vannini, I., et al. (2015) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djv135 · Cited by 359
London, W. B., Castel, V., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Pearson, A. D. J., Cohn, S. L., Berthold, F., Nakagawara, A., Ladenstein, R. L., Iehara, T., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.34.3392 · Cited by 318
Self-citationPrognostic Impact of Gene Expression–Based Classification for Neuroblastoma
Oberthuer, A., Hero, B., Berthold, F., Juraeva, D., Faldum, A., Kahlert, Y., Asgharzadeh, S., Seeger, R., Scaruffi, P., Tonini, G. P., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.3367 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D. J., London, W. B., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Brodeur, G. M., Faldum, A., Hero, B., Iehara, T., Machin, D., Mosseri, V., Simon, T., Garaventa, A., Castel, V., & Matthay, K. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-01-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-297
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2152420890
- Cited by
- 1,910
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.16.6785
- The paper
- Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D. J., London, W. B., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Brodeur, G. M., Faldum, A., Hero, B., Iehara, T., Machin, D., Mosseri, V., Simon, T., Garaventa, A., Castel, V., & Matthay, K. K. (2009). The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.6785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.