Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 687

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel for Unresectable Angiosarcoma: The ANGIOTAX Study

Open access
Penel, Nicolas, Bui, Binh Nguyen, Bay, Jacques-Olivier, Cupissol, Didier, Ray-Coquard, Isabelle, Piperno-Neumann, Sophie, Kerbrat, Pierre, Fournier, Charles, Taieb, Sophie, Jimenez, Marta, Isambert, Nicolas, Peyrade, Frédéric, Chevreau, Christine, Bompas, Emmanuelle, Brain, Etienne G.C., Blay, Jean-Yves·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients were entered onto the study from April 2005 through October 2006. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously as a 60-minute infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was the nonprogression rate after two cycles. Results: The progression-free survival rates after 2 and 4 months were 74% and 45%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the median time to progression was 4 months and the median overall survival was 8 months. The progression-free survival rate was similar in patients pretreated with chemotherapy and in chemotherapy-naïve patients (77% v 71%). Three patients with locally advanced breast angiosarcoma presented partial response, which enabled a secondary curative-intent surgery with complete histologic response in two cases. One toxic death occurred as a result of a thrombocytopenia episode. Six patients presented with grade 3 toxicities and one patient presented with a grade 4 toxicity. Anemia and fatigue were the most frequently reported toxicities. Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel at the dose schedule used in the current study was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.17.3146

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 687

Metadata

Authors
Penel, N., Bui, B. N., Bay, J.-O., Cupissol, D., Ray-Coquard, I., Piperno-Neumann, S., Kerbrat, P., Fournier, C., Taieb, S., Jimenez, M., Isambert, N., Peyrade, F., Chevreau, C., Bompas, E., Brain, E. G. C., & Blay, J.-Y.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-11-10
Volume
26
Issue
32
Pages
5269-5274
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2170973522
Cited by
687
References
23
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel for Unresectable Angiosarcoma: The ANGIOTAX Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.17.3146
The paper
Penel, N., Bui, B. N., Bay, J.-O., Cupissol, D., Ray-Coquard, I., Piperno-Neumann, S., Kerbrat, P., Fournier, C., Taieb, S., Jimenez, M., Isambert, N., Peyrade, F., Chevreau, C., Bompas, E., Brain, E. G. C., & Blay, J.-Y. (2008). Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel for Unresectable Angiosarcoma: The ANGIOTAX Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.3146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.