Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 604

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy: A New Outcome End Point After Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

Blazer, Dan G., Kishi, Yoji, Maru, Dipen M., Kopetz, Scott, Chun, Yun Shin, Overman, Michael J., Fogelman, David, Eng, Cathy, Chang, David Z., Wang, Huamin, Zorzi, Daria, Ribero, Dario, Ellis, Lee M., Glover, Katrina Y., Wolff, Robert A., Curley, Steven A., Abdalla, Eddie K., Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate whether pathologic response to chemotherapy predicts patient survival after preoperative chemotherapy and resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The secondary goal of the study was to identify the clinical predictors of pathologic response. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 305 patients who underwent preoperative irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by resection of CLM. Pathologic response was systematically evaluated and reported as the mean of the percentage of cancer cells remaining within each tumor. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictors of pathologic response and survival. Results: Cumulative 5-year overall survival rates by pathologic response status were as follows: 75% complete response (no residual cancer cells), 56% major response (1% to 49% residual cancer cells), and 33% minor response (≥ 50% residual cancer cells; complete v major response, P = .037; major v minor response, P = .028). Multivariate analysis revealed that only surgical margin status (P = .050; hazard ratio [HR], 1.77) and pathologic response (major response: P = .034; HR, 4.80; minor response: P = .007; HR, 6.93) were independent predictors of survival. Multivariate analysis of the predictors of pathologic response revealed that carcinoembryonic antigen level ≤ 5 ng/mL, tumor size ≤ 3 cm, and chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin and bevacizumab were independent predictors of pathologic response. Conclusion: Pathologic response predicts survival after preoperative chemotherapy and resection of CLM. Degree of pathologic response represents a new outcome end point for prognosis after resection of CLM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.17.5299

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 604

Metadata

Authors
Blazer, D. G., Kishi, Y., Maru, D. M., Kopetz, S., Chun, Y. S., Overman, M. J., Fogelman, D., Eng, C., Chang, D. Z., Wang, H., Zorzi, D., Ribero, D., Ellis, L. M., Glover, K. Y., Wolff, R. A., Curley, S. A., Abdalla, E. K., & Vauthey, J.-N.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-11-20
Volume
26
Issue
33
Pages
5344-5351
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110915643
Cited by
604
References
0
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy: A New Outcome End Point After Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.17.5299
The paper
Blazer, D. G., Kishi, Y., Maru, D. M., Kopetz, S., Chun, Y. S., Overman, M. J., Fogelman, D., Eng, C., Chang, D. Z., Wang, H., Zorzi, D., Ribero, D., Ellis, L. M., Glover, K. Y., Wolff, R. A., Curley, S. A., Abdalla, E. K., & Vauthey, J.-N. (2008). Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy: A New Outcome End Point After Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.5299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.