Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population Differences in Breast Cancer: Survey in Indigenous African Women Reveals Over-Representation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Huo, Dezheng, Ikpatt, Francis, Khramtsov, Andrey, Dangou, Jean-Marie, Nanda, Rita, Dignam, James, Zhang, Bifeng, Grushko, Tatyana, Zhang, Chunling, Oluwasola, Olayiwola, Malaka, David, Malami, Sani, Odetunde, Abayomi, Adeoye, Adewumi O., Iyare, Festus, Falusi, Adeyinka, Perou, Charles M., Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Compared with white women, black women experience a disproportionate burden of aggressive breast cancer for reasons that remain unknown and understudied. In the first study of its kind, we determined the distribution of molecular subtypes of invasive breast tumors in indigenous black women in West Africa. Patients and Methods: The study comprised 507 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1996 and 2007 at six geographic regions in Nigeria and Senegal. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were constructed into tissue microarrays and immunostained with 15 antibodies. Five molecular subtypes were determined, and hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to explore subgroups for unclassified cases. Results: The mean (± standard deviation) age of 378 patients in the first cohort was 44.8 ± 11.8 years, with the majority of women presenting with large (4.4 ± 2.0 cm) high-grade tumors (83%) in advanced stages (72% node positive). The proportions of estrogen receptor (ER) –positive, progesterone receptor–positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive tumors were 24%, 20%, and 17%, respectively. Triple negativity for these markers was predominant, including basal-like (27%) and unclassified subtype (28%). Other subtypes were luminal A (27%), luminal B (2%), and HER2 positive/ER negative (15%). The findings were replicated in the second cohort of 129 patients. The unclassified cases could be grouped into a bad prognosis branch, with expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, B-cell lymphoma extra-large protein, and Cyclin E, and a good prognosis branch, with expression of B-cell lymphoma protein 2 and Cyclin D1. Conclusion: These findings underscore the urgent need for research into the etiology and treatment of the aggressive molecular subtypes that disproportionately affect young women in the African diaspora.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.19.6873

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Huo, D., Ikpatt, F., Khramtsov, A., Dangou, J.-M., Nanda, R., Dignam, J., Zhang, B., Grushko, T., Zhang, C., Oluwasola, O., Malaka, D., Malami, S., Odetunde, A., Adeoye, A. O., Iyare, F., Falusi, A., Perou, C. M., & Olopade, O. I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-09-20
Volume
27
Issue
27
Pages
4515-4521
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1965367061
Cited by
369
References
1
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population Differences in Breast Cancer: Survey in Indigenous African Women Reveals Over-Representation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.19.6873
The paper
Huo, D., Ikpatt, F., Khramtsov, A., Dangou, J.-M., Nanda, R., Dignam, J., Zhang, B., Grushko, T., Zhang, C., Oluwasola, O., Malaka, D., Malami, S., Odetunde, A., Adeoye, A. O., Iyare, F., Falusi, A., Perou, C. M., & Olopade, O. I. (2009). Population Differences in Breast Cancer: Survey in Indigenous African Women Reveals Over-Representation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.19.6873

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.