Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,117

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wait-and-See Policy for Clinical Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer

Maas, Monique, Beets-Tan, Regina G.H., Lambregts, Doenja M.J., Lammering, Guido, Nelemans, Patty J., Engelen, Sanne M.E., van Dam, Ronald M., Jansen, Rob L.H., Sosef, Meindert, Leijtens, Jeroen W.A., Hulsewé, Karel W.E., Buijsen, Jeroen, Beets, Geerard L.·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer can result in complete disappearance of tumor and involved nodes. In patients without residual tumor on imaging and endoscopy (clinical complete response [cCR]) a wait-and-see-policy (omission of surgery with follow-up) might be considered instead of surgery. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of a wait-and-see policy with strict selection criteria and follow-up. Patients and Methods: Patients with a cCR after chemoradiotherapy were prospectively selected for the wait-and-see policy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopy plus biopsies. Follow-up was performed 3 to 6 monthly and consisted of MRI, endoscopy, and computed tomography scans. A control group of patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) after surgery was identified from a prospective cohort study. Functional outcome was measured with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) bowel function questionnaire and Wexner incontinence score. Long-term outcome was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Twenty-one patients with cCR were included in the wait-and-see policy group. Mean follow-up was 25 ± 19 months. One patient developed a local recurrence and had surgery as salvage treatment. The other 20 patients are alive without disease. The control group consisted of 20 patients with a pCR after surgery who had a mean follow-up of 35 ± 23 months. For these patients with a pCR, cumulative probabilities of 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 93% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: A wait-and-see policy with strict selection criteria, up-to-date imaging techniques, and follow-up is feasible and results in promising outcome at least as good as that of patients with a pCR after surgery. The proposed selection criteria and follow-up could form the basis for future randomized studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.37.7176

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,117

Metadata

Authors
Maas, M., Beets-Tan, R. G. H., Lambregts, D. M. J., Lammering, G., Nelemans, P. J., Engelen, S. M. E., van Dam, R. M., Jansen, R. L. H., Sosef, M., Leijtens, J. W. A., Hulsewé, K. W. E., Buijsen, J., & Beets, G. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-12-10
Volume
29
Issue
35
Pages
4633-4640
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2161581516
Cited by
1,117
References
0
FWCI
26.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wait-and-See Policy for Clinical Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.37.7176
The paper
Maas, M., Beets-Tan, R. G. H., Lambregts, D. M. J., Lammering, G., Nelemans, P. J., Engelen, S. M. E., van Dam, R. M., Jansen, R. L. H., Sosef, M., Leijtens, J. W. A., Hulsewé, K. W. E., Buijsen, J., & Beets, G. L. (2011). Wait-and-See Policy for Clinical Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.7176

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.