Cited by 755Cancer Cells and MetastasisColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Patient-Derived Organoids Predict Chemoradiation Responses of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Open access
Yao, Ye, Xu, Xiaoya, Yang, Lifeng, Zhu, Ji, Wan, Juefeng, Shen, Lijun, Xia, Fan, Fu, Guoxiang +20 more·2020·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

Accumulating evidence indicates that patient-derived organoids (PDOs) can predict drug responses in the clinic, but the ability of PDOs to predict responses to chemoradiation in cancer patients remains an open question. Here we generate a living organoid biobank from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR) enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. Our co-clinical trial data confirm that rectal cancer organoids (RCOs) closely recapitulate the pathophysiology and genetic changes of corresponding tumors. Chemoradiation responses in patients are highly matched to RCO responses, with 84.43% accuracy, 78.01% sensitivity, and 91.97% specificity. These data imply that PDOs predict LARC patient responses in the clinic and may represent a companion diagnostic tool in rectal cancer treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2019.10.010

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]1. Aronson, S.J. ∙ Rehm, H.L. Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine Nature. 2015; 526:336-342 Crossref Scopus (349) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Blokzijl, F. ∙ Janssen, R. ∙ van Boxtel, R. ... MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes Genome Med. 2018; 10:33 Crossref Scopus (402) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Boeva, V. ∙ Popova, T. ∙ Bleakley, K. ... Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data Bioinformatics. 2012; 28:423-425 Crossref Scopus (682) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Boj, S.F. ∙ Hwang, C.I. ∙ Baker, L.A. ... Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer Cell. 2015; 160:324-338 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1494) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [8]8. Cristobal, A. ∙ van den Toorn, H.W.P. ∙ van de Wetering, M. ... Personalized Proteome Profiles of Healthy and Tumor Human Colon Organoids Reveal Both Individual Diversity and Basic Features of Colorectal Cancer Cell Rep. 2017; 18:263-274 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (118) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [10]10. Ganesh, K. ∙ Wu, C. ∙ O’Rourke, K.P. ... A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation Nat. Med. 2019; 2019:7 Google Scholar
  7. [12]12. Hubert, C.G. ∙ Rivera, M. ∙ Spangler, L.C. ... A Three-Dimensional Organoid Culture System Derived from Human Glioblastomas Recapitulates the Hypoxic Gradients and Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity of Tumors Found In Vivo Cancer Res. 2016; 76:2465-2477 Crossref Scopus (431) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [13]13. Joyner, M.J. ∙ Paneth, N. Seven Questions for Personalized Medicine JAMA. 2015; 314:999-1000 Crossref Scopus (181) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [14]14. Kopper, O. ∙ de Witte, C.J. ∙ Lõhmussaar, K. ... An organoid platform for ovarian cancer captures intra- and interpatient heterogeneity Nat. Med. 2019; 25:838-849 Crossref Scopus (496) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [18]18. Maas, M. ∙ Beets-Tan, R.G.H. ∙ Lambregts, D.M.J. ... Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2011; 29:4633-4640 Crossref Scopus (865) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [19]19. McKenna, A. ∙ Hanna, M. ∙ Banks, E. ... The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data Genome Res. 2010; 20:1297-1303 Crossref Scopus (18081) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [20]20. Minsky, B.D. Rectal cancer: is ‘watch and wait’ a safe option for rectal cancer? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013; 10:698-700 Crossref Scopus (10) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [21]21. Mullenders, J. ∙ de Jongh, E. ∙ Brousali, A. ... Mouse and human urothelial cancer organoids: A tool for bladder cancer research Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019; 116:4567-4574 Crossref Scopus (169) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [22]22. Nanki, K. ∙ Toshimitsu, K. ∙ Takano, A. ... Divergent Routes toward Wnt and R-spondin Niche Independency during Human Gastric Carcinogenesis Cell. 2018; 174:856-869.e17 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (234) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [24]24. Patel, U.B. ∙ Taylor, F. ∙ Blomqvist, L. ... Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience J. Clin. Oncol. 2011; 29:3753-3760 Crossref Scopus (532) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [25]25. Pauli, C. ∙ Hopkins, B.D. ∙ Prandi, D. ... Personalized In Vitro and In Vivo Cancer Models to Guide Precision Medicine Cancer Discov. 2017; 7:462-477 Crossref Scopus (709) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [26]26. Puca, L. ∙ Bareja, R. ∙ Prandi, D. ... Patient derived organoids to model rare prostate cancer phenotypes Nat. Commun. 2018; 9:2404 Crossref Scopus (245) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [30]30. Schrag, D. ∙ Weiser, M.R. ∙ Goodman, K.A. ... Neoadjuvant FOLFOX-bev, without radiation, for locally advanced rectal cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28:3511 Crossref Google Scholar
  19. [31]31. Schütte, M. ∙ Risch, T. ∙ Abdavi-Azar, N. ... Molecular dissection of colorectal cancer in pre-clinical models identifies biomarkers predicting sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors Nat. Commun. 2017; 8:14262 Crossref Scopus (251) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [32]32. Seino, T. ∙ Kawasaki, S. ∙ Shimokawa, M. ... Human Pancreatic Tumor Organoids Reveal Loss of Stem Cell Niche Factor Dependence during Disease Progression Cell Stem Cell. 2018; 22:454-467.e6 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (421) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [33]33. Tentler, J.J. ∙ Tan, A.C. ∙ Weekes, C.D. ... Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 9:338-350 Crossref Scopus (1027) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [40]40. Voest, E.E. ∙ Bernards, R. DNA-Guided Precision Medicine for Cancer: A Case of Irrational Exuberance? Cancer Discov. 2016; 6:130-132 Crossref Scopus (46) PubMed Google Scholar
  23. [41]41. Wang, K. ∙ Li, M. ∙ Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:e164 Crossref Scopus (9725) PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [42]42. Washington, M.K. ∙ Berlin, J. ∙ Branton, P. ..., Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2009; 133:1539-1551 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [43]43. Weeber, F. ∙ van de Wetering, M. ∙ Hoogstraat, M. ... Preserved genetic diversity in organoids cultured from biopsies of human colorectal cancer metastases Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015; 112:13308-13311 Crossref Scopus (355) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Y., Xu, X., Yang, L., Zhu, J., Wan, J., Shen, L., Xia, F., Fu, G., Deng, Y., Pan, M., Guo, Q., Gao, X., Li, Y., Rao, X., Zhou, Y., Liang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Li, G., Zhang, L., Peng, J., Cai, S., Hu, C., Gao, J., Clevers, H., Zhang, Z., & Hua, G.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Zhen
  • Hua, Guoqiang
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
17-26.e6
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2994559322
Cited by
755
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 1
FWCI
29.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
patient-derived organoids, rectal cancer, locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organoid biobank, companion diagnostics, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Humans, Organoids, Rectal Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review