Cited by 125Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Tobacco Cessation and Control a Decade Later: American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update

Hanna, Nasser, Mulshine, James, Wollins, Dana S., Tyne, Courtney, Dresler, Carolyn·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Tobacco use constitutes the largest preventable cause of death and disability in developed countries and a rapidly growing health problem in developing nations. It is responsible for 30% of all cancer deaths and 80% of lung cancer deaths and is associated with increased risk for at least 17 types of cancer. In addition to the tremendous human toll tobacco has taken in the 20th and 21st centuries, the economic costs of tobacco-related illnesses remain enormous. From 2000 to 2004, the United States spent approximately $193 billion each year on tobacco-related illnesses and lost productivity because of tobaccorelated premature death. Loss in productivity and increased health care costs associated with secondhand smoke (SHS) were reported in 2005 to have cost the United States an additional $10 billion per year. Although the United States has witnessed a decline in cigarette use, the use of other tobacco products is on the rise. Furthermore, the rate of reduction of youth tobacco use is no longer as rapidly decreasing, despite intense public education and policy efforts to reduce youth tobacco use. At the global level, the epidemic of tobacco-related disease and death has just begun, because of the several-year lag between when individuals begin using tobacco and when their health suffers. Tobacco caused 100 million deaths in the 20th century. If current trends continue, it will cause up to 1 billion deaths in the 21st century. Unchecked, tobacco-related deaths will increase to m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.48.8932

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, N., Mulshine, J., Wollins, D. S., Tyne, C., & Dresler, C.
Affiliations
Indiana University Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
25
Pages
3147-3157
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2125483854
Cited by
125
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
tobacco cessation, tobacco control, passive smoking, oncology practice, tobacco policy, youth tobacco use, tobacco-related cancer, oncology workforce, smoking cessation counseling, tobacco control advocacy
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Societies, Medical, United States, Tobacco Use Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review