Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research

Open access
Dobrolecki, Lacey E., Airhart, Susie D., Alferez, Denis G., Aparicio, Samuel, Behbod, Fariba, Bentires-Alj, Mohamed, Brisken, Cathrin, Bult, Carol J., Cai, Shirong, Clarke, Robert B., Dowst, Heidi, Ellis, Matthew J., Gonzalez-Suarez, Eva, Iggo, Richard D., Kabos, Peter, Li, Shunqiang, Lindeman, Geoffrey J., Marangoni, Elisabetta, McCoy, Aaron, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Piwnica-Worms, Helen, Poupon, Marie-France, Reis-Filho, Jorge, Sartorius, Carol A., Scabia, Valentina, Sflomos, George, Tu, Yizheng, Vaillant, François, Visvader, Jane E., Welm, Alana, Wicha, Max S., Lewis, Michael T.·2016·Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of a growing spectrum of cancers are rapidly supplanting long-established traditional cell lines as preferred models for conducting basic and translational preclinical research. In breast cancer, to complement the now curated collection of approximately 45 long-established human breast cancer cell lines, a newly formed consortium of academic laboratories, currently from Europe, Australia, and North America, herein summarizes data on over 500 stably transplantable PDX models representing all three clinical subtypes of breast cancer (ER+, HER2+, and “Triple-negative” (TNBC)). Many of these models are well-characterized with respect to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic features, metastatic behavior, and treatment response to a variety of standard-of-care and experimental therapeutics. These stably transplantable PDX lines are generally available for dissemination to laboratories conducting translational research, and contact information for each collection is provided. This review summarizes current experiences related to PDX generation across participating groups, efforts to develop data standards for annotation and dissemination of patient clinical information that does not compromise patient privacy, efforts to develop complementary data standards for annotation of PDX characteristics and biology, and progress toward “credentialing” of PDX models as surrogates to represent individual patients for use in preclinical and co-clinical translational research. In addition, this review highlights important unresolved questions, as well as current limitations, that have hampered more efficient generation of PDX lines and more rapid adoption of PDX use in translational breast cancer research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10555-016-9653-x

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Show all 194 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Dobrolecki, L. E., Airhart, S. D., Alferez, D. G., Aparicio, S., Behbod, F., Bentires-Alj, M., Brisken, C., Bult, C. J., Cai, S., Clarke, R. B., Dowst, H., Ellis, M. J., Gonzalez-Suarez, E., Iggo, R. D., Kabos, P., Li, S., Lindeman, G. J., Marangoni, E., McCoy, A., Meric-Bernstam, F., Piwnica-Worms, H., Poupon, M.-F., Reis-Filho, J., Sartorius, C. A., Scabia, V., Sflomos, G., Tu, Y., Vaillant, F., Visvader, J. E., Welm, A., Wicha, M. S., & Lewis, M. T.
Venue
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
Published
2016-12
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
547-573
ISSN
  • 0167-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7233
OpenAlex
W2564066883
Cited by
267
References
194
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10555-016-9653-x
The paper
Dobrolecki, L. E., Airhart, S. D., Alferez, D. G., Aparicio, S., Behbod, F., Bentires-Alj, M., Brisken, C., Bult, C. J., Cai, S., Clarke, R. B., Dowst, H., Ellis, M. J., Gonzalez-Suarez, E., Iggo, R. D., Kabos, P., Li, S., Lindeman, G. J., Marangoni, E., McCoy, A., . . . Lewis, M. T. (2016). Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-016-9653-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.