The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on geriatric assessment (GA) in older patients with cancer. Methods: SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care. Results: GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensity. The panel recommended that the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health status, fatigue, social status and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes. Although several combinations of tools and various models are available for implementation of GA in oncology practice, the expert panel could not endorse one over another. Conclusion: There is mounting data regarding the utility of GA in oncology practice; however, additional research is needed to continue to strengthen the evidence base.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis
Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Baeyens, J. P., Bauer, J. M., Boirie, Y., Cederholm, T., Landi, F., Martin, F. C., Michel, J.-P., Rolland, Y., Schneider, S. M., et al. (2010) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afq034 · Cited by 11,601
Self-citationThe American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x · Cited by 2,578
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study
Hurria, A., Togawa, K., Mohile, S. G., Owusu, C., Klepin, H. D., Gross, C. P., Lichtman, S. M., Gajra, A., Bhatia, S., Katheria, V., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.34.7625 · Cited by 1,841
Self-citationUse of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients:
Extermann, M., Aapro, M., Bernabei, R., Cohen, H. J., Droz, J.-P., Lichtman, S., Mor, V., Monfardini, S., Repetto, L., Sørbye, L., et al. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003 · Cited by 1,098
Self-citationEllis, G., Whitehead, M. A., Robinson, D., O'Neill, D., & Langhorne, P. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6553 · Cited by 1,068
Prognostic Indices for Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Yourman, L. C., Lee, S. J., Schonberg, M. A., Widera, E. W., & Smith, A. K. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1966 · Cited by 736
Implementing a Geriatric Assessment in Cooperative Group Clinical Cancer Trials: CALGB 360401
Hurria, A., Cirrincione, C. T., Muss, H. B., Kornblith, A. B., Barry, W., Artz, A. S., Schmieder, L., Ansari, R., Tew, W. P., Weckstein, D., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.6985 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Cited by
Mohile, S. G., Dale, W., Somerfield, M. R., Schonberg, M. A., Boyd, C. M., Burhenn, P. S., Canin, B., Cohen, H. J., Holmes, H. M., Hopkins, J. O., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.78.8687 · Cited by 1,479
Self-citationSenescent cells: an emerging target for diseases of ageing
Childs, B. G., Gluscevic, M., Baker, D. J., Laberge, R.-M., Marquess, D., Dananberg, J., & van Deursen, J. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.116 · Cited by 1,284
Bluethmann, S. M., Mariotto, A. B., & Rowland, J. H. (2016) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0133 · Cited by 1,146
The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review
Handforth, C., Clegg, A., Young, C., Simpkins, S., Seymour, M. T., Selby, P. J., & Young, J. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu540 · Cited by 1,048
Validation of a prediction tool for chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer
Hurria, A., Mohile, S., Gajra, A., Klepin, H., Muss, H., Chapman, A., Feng, T., Smith, D., Sun, C.-L., De Glas, N., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.4327 · Cited by 598
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wildiers, H., Heeren, P., Puts, M., Topinkova, E., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G., Extermann, M., Falandry, C., Artz, A., Brain, E., Colloca, G., Flamaing, J., Karnakis, T., Kenis, C., Audisio, R. A., Mohile, S., Repetto, L., Van Leeuwen, B., Milisen, K., & Hurria, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2014-08-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2595-2603
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2167600867
- Cited by
- 1,831
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 48.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.54.8347
- The paper
- Wildiers, H., Heeren, P., Puts, M., Topinkova, E., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G., Extermann, M., Falandry, C., Artz, A., Brain, E., Colloca, G., Flamaing, J., Karnakis, T., Kenis, C., Audisio, R. A., Mohile, S., Repetto, L., Van Leeuwen, B., Milisen, K., & Hurria, A. (2014). International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.8347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
