Cited by 350Frailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in AgingAging and Gerontology Research

Implementing a Geriatric Assessment in Cooperative Group Clinical Cancer Trials: CALGB 360401

Open access
Hurria, Arti, Cirrincione, Constance T., Muss, Hyman B., Kornblith, Alice B., Barry, William, Artz, Andrew S., Schmieder, Linda, Ansari, Rafat +10 more·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Factors captured in a geriatric assessment can predict morbidity and mortality in older adults, but are not routinely measured in cancer clinical trials. This study evaluated the implementation of a geriatric assessment tool in the cooperative group setting. Patients and Methods: Patients age ≥ 65 with cancer, who enrolled on cooperative group cancer trials, were eligible to enroll on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 360401. They completed a geriatric assessment tool before initiation of protocol therapy, consisting of valid and reliable geriatric assessment measures which are primarily self-administered and require minimal resources and time by healthcare providers. The assessment measures functional status, comorbidity, cognitive function, psychological state, social support, and nutritional status. The protocol specified criteria for incorporation of the tool in future cooperative group trials was based on the time to completion and percent of patients who could complete their portion without assistance. Patient satisfaction with the tool was captured. Results: Of the 93 patients who enrolled in this study, five (5%) met criteria for cognitive impairment and three did not complete the cognitive screen, leaving 85 assessable patients (median age, 72 years). The median time to complete the geriatric assessment tool was 22 minutes, 87% of patients (n = 74) completed their portion without assistance, 92% (n = 78) were satisfied with the questionnaire length, 95% (n = 81) reported no difficult questions, and 96% (n = 82) reported no upsetting questions. One hundred percent of health care professionals completed their portion. Conclusion: This brief, primarily self-administered geriatric assessment tool met the protocol specified criteria for inclusion in future cooperative group clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.30.6985

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurria, A., Cirrincione, C. T., Muss, H. B., Kornblith, A. B., Barry, W., Artz, A. S., Schmieder, L., Ansari, R., Tew, W. P., Weckstein, D., Kirshner, J., Togawa, K., Hansen, K., Katheria, V., Stone, R., Galinsky, I., Postiglione, J., & Cohen, H. J.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1290-1296
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2156402672
Cited by
350
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Celgene
  • Genentech
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG026749)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-41287, U10CA077440, U10CA077651, CA 77651, CA 47577, CA59518, CA86726, CA-33601, U10CA033601, U10CA045808, U10CA059518, CA45389, U10CA032291, U10CA047577, U10CA086726, U10CA031946, CA-77406, U10CA077406, U10CA045389, CA 32291, U10CA041287, U10CA077658, U10CA035421, CA-31946)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
geriatric assessment, elderly cancer patients, functional status, comorbidities, cognitive screening, patient satisfaction, nutritional status, social support
MeSH terms
Aged, Attention, Cognition, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Memory, Neoplasms, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Patient Satisfaction, Karnofsky Performance Status, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review