Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,783

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Liver Function in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Evidence-Based Approach—The ALBI Grade

Open access
Johnson, Philip J., Berhane, Sarah, Kagebayashi, Chiaki, Satomura, Shinji, Teng, Mabel, Reeves, Helen L., O'Beirne, James, Fox, Richard, Skowronska, Anna, Palmer, Daniel, Yeo, Winnie, Mo, Frankie, Lai, Paul, Iñarrairaegui, Mercedes, Chan, Stephen L., Sangro, Bruno, Miksad, Rebecca, Tada, Toshifumi, Kumada, Takashi, Toyoda, Hidenori·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have associated chronic liver disease, the severity of which is currently assessed by the Child-Pugh (C-P) grade. In this international collaboration, we identify objective measures of liver function/dysfunction that independently influence survival in patients with HCC and then combine these into a model that could be compared with the conventional C-P grade. Patients and Methods: We developed a simple model to assess liver function, based on 1,313 patients with HCC of all stages from Japan, that involved only serum bilirubin and albumin levels. We then tested the model using similar cohorts from other geographical regions (n = 5,097) and other clinical situations (patients undergoing resection [n = 525] or sorafenib treatment for advanced HCC [n = 1,132]). The specificity of the model for liver (dys)function was tested in patients with chronic liver disease but without HCC (n = 501). Results: The model, the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade, performed at least as well as the C-P grade in all geographic regions. The majority of patients with HCC had C-P grade A disease at presentation, and within this C-P grade, ALBI revealed two classes with clearly different prognoses. Its utility in patients with chronic liver disease alone supported the contention that the ALBI grade was indeed an index of liver (dys)function. Conclusion: The ALBI grade offers a simple, evidence-based, objective, and discriminatory method of assessing liver function in HCC that has been extensively tested in an international setting. This new model eliminates the need for subjective variables such as ascites and encephalopathy, a requirement in the conventional C-P grade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.57.9151

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1007/BF01297149 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07057.x · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07057.x · Paper page
  3. Child CG, 1964, Major Probl Clin Surg, 1, 1
  4. van Dam GM, 1999, Hepatogastroenterology, 46, 108
  5. 10.1002/hep.510250501 · DOI
  6. 10.1055/s-2008-1040325 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0168-8278(87)80021-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Johnson PJ, Presented at International Liver Congress London, European Association for the Study of the Liver
  9. 10.1055/s-2007-1007122 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00504-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/sim.2331 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.021 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.06.007 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06329.x · DOI
  15. 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4410 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.8372 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, 2003, The General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer (English ed)
  18. Taktak A, 2007, Comput Intell Med
  19. 10.1177/1536867X0600600302 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/1536867X1001000303 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/bjc.2014.130 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1136/gut.52.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/hep.24199 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/hep.20933 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.18773/austprescr.2001.009 · doi:10.18773/austprescr.2001.009
  28. Miksad RA, 2014, J Clin Oncol, 32

Cited by

See all 2,783

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, P. J., Berhane, S., Kagebayashi, C., Satomura, S., Teng, M., Reeves, H. L., O'Beirne, J., Fox, R., Skowronska, A., Palmer, D., Yeo, W., Mo, F., Lai, P., Iñarrairaegui, M., Chan, S. L., Sangro, B., Miksad, R., Tada, T., Kumada, T., & Toyoda, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-02-20
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
550-558
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2119190881
Cited by
2,783
References
2
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Liver Function in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Evidence-Based Approach—The ALBI Grade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9151
The paper
Johnson, P. J., Berhane, S., Kagebayashi, C., Satomura, S., Teng, M., Reeves, H. L., O'Beirne, J., Fox, R., Skowronska, A., Palmer, D., Yeo, W., Mo, F., Lai, P., Iñarrairaegui, M., Chan, S. L., Sangro, B., Miksad, R., Tada, T., Kumada, T., & Toyoda, H. (2015). Assessment of Liver Function in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Evidence-Based Approach—The ALBI Grade. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.