The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect
Open accessAbstract
The incidence of kidney cancer has been rising over the last two decades, especially in cases where the disease is localized. Although rates of renal surgery parallel this trend, mortality rates have continued to rise. To investigate the basis of this "treatment disconnect" (i.e., increased rates of treatment accompanied by increased mortality rates), we analyzed patient data from nine registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We assembled a cohort of 34,503 kidney cancer patients and derived incidence, treatment, and mortality trends for kidney cancer, overall and as a function of tumor size. From 1983 to 2002, the overall age-adjusted incidence rate for kidney cancer rose from 7.1 to 10.8 cases per 100,000 US population; tumors < or = 4 cm in size accounted for most of the increase. Adjusted rates of renal surgery increased concurrently, most notably for tumors < or = 4 cm (0.9-3.6 surgeries per 100,000 US population). However, among kidney cancer patients, all-cause mortality per 100,000 US population increased from 1.5 deaths in 1983 to 6.5 deaths in 2002, with the greatest absolute increase noted for patients with lesions > 7 cm. Our results demonstrate that the rising incidence of kidney cancer is largely attributable to an increase in small renal masses that are presumably curable. The fact that increased detection and treatment of small tumors is not reducing mortality argues for a reassessment of the current treatment paradigm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy
Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199304293281706 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Gill, I. S., Aron, M., Gervais, D. A., & Jewett, M. A. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp0910041 · Cited by 406
Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Finelli, A., Ismaila, N., Bro, B., Durack, J., Eggener, S., Evans, A., Gill, I., Graham, D., Huang, W., Jewett, M. A. S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645 · Cited by 367
A global view on cancer incidence and national levels of the human development index
Fidler, M. M., Soerjomataram, I., & Bray, F. (2016) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.30382 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S., & Hollenbeck, B. K.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1331-1334
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2097096070
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj362
- The paper
- Hollingsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S., & Hollenbeck, B. K. (2006). Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.