Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect

Open access
Hollingsworth, John M., Miller, David C., Daignault, Stephanie, Hollenbeck, Brent K.·2006·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The incidence of kidney cancer has been rising over the last two decades, especially in cases where the disease is localized. Although rates of renal surgery parallel this trend, mortality rates have continued to rise. To investigate the basis of this "treatment disconnect" (i.e., increased rates of treatment accompanied by increased mortality rates), we analyzed patient data from nine registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We assembled a cohort of 34,503 kidney cancer patients and derived incidence, treatment, and mortality trends for kidney cancer, overall and as a function of tumor size. From 1983 to 2002, the overall age-adjusted incidence rate for kidney cancer rose from 7.1 to 10.8 cases per 100,000 US population; tumors < or = 4 cm in size accounted for most of the increase. Adjusted rates of renal surgery increased concurrently, most notably for tumors < or = 4 cm (0.9-3.6 surgeries per 100,000 US population). However, among kidney cancer patients, all-cause mortality per 100,000 US population increased from 1.5 deaths in 1983 to 6.5 deaths in 2002, with the greatest absolute increase noted for patients with lesions > 7 cm. Our results demonstrate that the rising incidence of kidney cancer is largely attributable to an increase in small renal masses that are presumably curable. The fact that increased detection and treatment of small tumors is not reducing mortality argues for a reassessment of the current treatment paradigm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djj362

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,173

Metadata

Authors
Hollingsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S., & Hollenbeck, B. K.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2006-09-20
Volume
98
Issue
18
Pages
1331-1334
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2097096070
Cited by
1,173
References
1
FWCI
31.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj362
The paper
Hollingsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S., & Hollenbeck, B. K. (2006). Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.