Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019

Open access
Gupta, Samir, Provenzale, Dawn, Llor, Xavier, Halverson, Amy L., Grady, William, Chung, Daniel C., Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis, Markowitz, Arnold J., Slavin Jr, Thomas P., Hampel, Heather, CGC, Ness, Reid M., Weiss, Jennifer M., Ahnen, Dennis J., Chen, Lee-may, Cooper, Gregory, Early, Dayna S., Giardiello, Francis M., Hall, Michael J., Hamilton, Stanley R., Kanth, Priyanka, Klapman, Jason B., Lazenby, Audrey J., Lynch, Patrick M., Mayer, Robert J., Mikkelson, June, CGC, Peter, Shajan, Regenbogen, Scott E., Dwyer, Mary A., CGC, Ogba, Ndiya·2019·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Identifying individuals with hereditary syndromes allows for improved cancer surveillance, risk reduction, and optimized management. Establishing criteria for assessment allows for the identification of individuals who are carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal provide recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with high-risk colorectal cancer syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on criteria for the evaluation of Lynch syndrome and considerations for use of multigene testing in the assessment of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, S., Provenzale, D., Llor, X., Halverson, A. L., Grady, W., Chung, D. C., Haraldsdottir, S., Markowitz, A. J., Slavin Jr, T. P., Hampel, H., CGC, Ness, R. M., Weiss, J. M., Ahnen, D. J., Chen, L.-M., Cooper, G., Early, D. S., Giardiello, F. M., Hall, M. J., Hamilton, S. R., Kanth, P., Klapman, J. B., Lazenby, A. J., Lynch, P. M., Mayer, R. J., Mikkelson, J., CGC, Peter, S., Regenbogen, S. E., Dwyer, M. A., CGC, & Ogba, N.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2019-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1032-1041
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W2987318433
Cited by
331
References
52
FWCI
30.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044
The paper
Gupta, S., Provenzale, D., Llor, X., Halverson, A. L., Grady, W., Chung, D. C., Haraldsdottir, S., Markowitz, A. J., Slavin Jr, T. P., Hampel, H., CGC, Ness, R. M., Weiss, J. M., Ahnen, D. J., Chen, L.-M., Cooper, G., Early, D. S., Giardiello, F. M., Hall, M. J., . . . Ogba, N. (2019). NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.