Cited by 345Cancer survivorship and careCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Efficacy of Exercise Therapy on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Scott, Jessica M., Zabor, Emily C., Schwitzer, Emily, Koelwyn, Graeme J., Adams, Scott C., Nilsen, Tormod S., Moskowitz, Chaya S., Matsoukas, Konstantina +3 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of exercise therapy on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with adult-onset cancer. Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatment effect modifiers, safety, and fidelity. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify RCTs that compared exercise therapy to a nonexercise control group. The primary end point was change in CRF as evaluated by peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak; in mL O 2 × kg−1 × min−1) from baseline to postintervention. Subgroup analyses evaluated whether treatment effects differed as a function of exercise prescription (ie, modality, schedule, length, supervision), study characteristics (ie, intervention timing, primary cancer site), and publication year. Safety was defined as report of any adverse event (AE); fidelity was evaluated by rates of attendance, adherence, and loss to follow-up. Results: Forty-eight unique RCTs that represented 3,632 patients (mean standard deviation age, 55 ± 7.5 years; 68% women); 1,990 (55%) and 1,642 (45%) allocated to exercise therapy and control/usual care groups, respectively, were evaluated. Exercise therapy was associated with a significant increase in CRF (+2.80 mL O 2 × kg−1 × min−1) compared with no change (+0.02 mL O 2 × kg−1 × min−1) in the control group (weighted mean differences, +2.13 mL O 2 × kg−1 × min−1; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.67; I 2, 20.6; P < .001). No statistical significant differences were observed on the basis of any treatment effect modifiers. Thirty trials (63%) monitored AEs; a total of 44 AEs were reported. The mean standard deviation loss to follow-up, attendance, and adherence rates were 11% ± 13%, 84% ± 12%, and 88% ± 32%, respectively. Conclusion: Exercise therapy is an effective adjunctive therapy to improve CRF in patients with cancer. Our findings support the recommendation of exercise therapy for patients with adult-onset cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2017.77.5809

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research supports that cancer survivors can respond positively to exercise training by improving cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength and endurance, and body composition.

    “Research to date supports the potential of cancer survivors to respond positively to an exercise training stimulus by improving individual components of physical fitness, including cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., VO2peak)(86), muscular strength and endurance(87, 88), body composition(89).”
  • Randomized trials of aerobic exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy show preservation or improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness, especially in those with low initial values, while others report better improvement in those with higher initial values.

    “Randomized trials of aerobic exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate a preservation of, or an improvement in, cardiorespiratory fitness, especially in those with low initial values(86), while others report better improvement in those with higher initial values(91).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, J. M., Zabor, E. C., Schwitzer, E., Koelwyn, G. J., Adams, S. C., Nilsen, T. S., Moskowitz, C. S., Matsoukas, K., Iyengar, N. M., Dang, C. T., & Jones, L. W.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, Jessica M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
36
Issue
22
Pages
2297-2305
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2808328174
Cited by
345
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise therapy, cardiorespiratory fitness, cancer patients, peak oxygen uptake, exercise adherence, exercise safety, adjunctive therapy, exercise prescription, treatment effect modifiers
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Neoplasms, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review