Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,025

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Lancet, Jeffrey E., Uy, Geoffrey L., Cortes, Jorge E., Newell, Laura F., Lin, Tara L., Ritchie, Ellen K., Stuart, Robert K., Strickland, Stephen A., Hogge, Donna, Solomon, Scott R., Stone, Richard M., Bixby, Dale L., Kolitz, Jonathan E., Schiller, Gary J., Wieduwilt, Matthew J., Ryan, Daniel H., Hoering, Antje, Banerjee, Kamalika, Chiarella, Michael, Louie, Arthur C., Medeiros, Bruno C.·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients and Methods: In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival. Results: CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60. Conclusion: CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2017.77.6112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,025

Metadata

Authors
Lancet, J. E., Uy, G. L., Cortes, J. E., Newell, L. F., Lin, T. L., Ritchie, E. K., Stuart, R. K., Strickland, S. A., Hogge, D., Solomon, S. R., Stone, R. M., Bixby, D. L., Kolitz, J. E., Schiller, G. J., Wieduwilt, M. J., Ryan, D. H., Hoering, A., Banerjee, K., Chiarella, M., Louie, A. C., & Medeiros, B. C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
36
Issue
26
Pages
2684-2692
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2883399820
Cited by
1,025
References
1
FWCI
66.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2017.77.6112
The paper
Lancet, J. E., Uy, G. L., Cortes, J. E., Newell, L. F., Lin, T. L., Ritchie, E. K., Stuart, R. K., Strickland, S. A., Hogge, D., Solomon, S. R., Stone, R. M., Bixby, D. L., Kolitz, J. E., Schiller, G. J., Wieduwilt, M. J., Ryan, D. H., Hoering, A., Banerjee, K., Chiarella, M., . . . Medeiros, B. C. (2018). CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.77.6112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.