Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chan, Anthony T.C., Hui, Edwin P., Ngan, Roger K.C., Tung, Stewart Y., Cheng, Ashley C.K., Ng, Wai T., Lee, Victor H.F., Ma, Brigette B.Y., Cheng, Hoi C., Wong, Frank C.S., Loong, Herbert H.F., Tong, Macy, Poon, Darren M.C., Ahuja, Anil T., King, Ann D., Wang, Ki, Mo, Frankie, Zee, Benny C.Y., Chan, K.C. Allen, Lo, Y.M. Dennis·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains controversial. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a potential biomarker of subclinical residual disease in NPC. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we used plasma EBV DNA to identify patients with NPC at a higher risk of relapse for adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control stage IIB to IVB, adequate organ function, and no locoregional disease or distant metastasis were screened by plasma EBV DNA at 6 to 8 weeks after radiotherapy (RT). Patients with undetectable plasma EBV DNA underwent standard surveillance. Patients with detectable plasma EBV DNA were randomly assigned to either adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine for six cycles (arm 1) or observation (arm 2). Patients were stratified for primary treatment (RT v CRT) and stage (II/III v IV). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: Seven hundred eighty-nine patients underwent EBV DNA screening. Plasma EBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) and detectable in 216 (27.4%); 104 (13.2%) with detectable EBV DNA were randomly assigned to arms 1 (n = 52) and 2 (n = 52). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, no significant difference was found in 5-year RFS rate between arms 1 and 2 (49.3% v 54.7%; P = .75; hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.89). The level of post-RT plasma EBV DNA correlated significantly with the hazards of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and death. Conclusion: In patients with NPC with detectable post-RT plasma EBV DNA, adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine did not improve RFS. Post-RT plasma EBV DNA level should be incorporated as the selection factor in future clinical trials of adjuvant therapy in NPC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2018.77.7847

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Chan, A. T. C., Hui, E. P., Ngan, R. K. C., Tung, S. Y., Cheng, A. C. K., Ng, W. T., Lee, V. H. F., Ma, B. B. Y., Cheng, H. C., Wong, F. C. S., Loong, H. H. F., Tong, M., Poon, D. M. C., Ahuja, A. T., King, A. D., Wang, K., Mo, F., Zee, B. C. Y., Chan, K. C. A., & Lo, Y. M. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
36
Issue
31
Pages
3091-3100
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2881137594
Cited by
252
References
1
FWCI
22.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2018.77.7847
The paper
Chan, A. T. C., Hui, E. P., Ngan, R. K. C., Tung, S. Y., Cheng, A. C. K., Ng, W. T., Lee, V. H. F., Ma, B. B. Y., Cheng, H. C., Wong, F. C. S., Loong, H. H. F., Tong, M., Poon, D. M. C., Ahuja, A. T., King, A. D., Wang, K., Mo, F., Zee, B. C. Y., Chan, K. C. A., & Lo, Y. M. D. (2018). Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.77.7847

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.