Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: The JUPITER-02 Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Mai, Hai-Qiang, Chen, Qiu-Yan, Chen, Dongping, Hu, Chaosu, Yang, Kunyu, Wen, Jiyu, Li, Jingao, Shi, Yingrui, Jin, Feng, Xu, Ruilian, Pan, Jianji, Qu, Shenhong, Li, Ping, Hu, Chunhong, Liu, Yi-Chun, Jiang, Yi, He, Xia, Wang, Hung-Ming, Lim, Wan-Teck, Liao, Wangjun, He, Xiaohui, Chen, Xiaozhong, Wang, Siyang, Yuan, Xianglin, Li, Qi, Lin, Xiaoyan, Jing, Shanghua, Chen, Yanju, Lu, Yin, Hsieh, Ching-Yun, Yang, Muh-Hwa, Yen, Chia-Jui, Samol, Jens, Luo, Xianming, Wang, Xiaojun, Tang, Xiongwen, Feng, Hui, Yao, Sheng, Keegan, Patricia, Xu, Rui-Hua·2023·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: There are currently no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Gemcitabine-cisplatin is the current standard of care for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic NPC (RM-NPC). Objective: To determine whether toripalimab in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin will significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival as first-line treatment for RM-NPC, compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: JUPITER-02 is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study conducted in NPC-endemic regions, including mainland China, Taiwan, and Singapore. From November 10, 2018, to October 20, 2019, 289 patients with RM-NPC with no prior systemic chemotherapy in the RM setting were enrolled from 35 participating centers. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab (240 mg [n = 146]) or placebo (n = 143) in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin for up to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with toripalimab or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Main Outcome: Progression-free survival as assessed by a blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival assessed by investigator, duration of response, and safety. Results: Among the 289 patients enrolled (median age, 46 [IQR, 38-53 years; 17% female), at the final progression-free survival analysis, toripalimab treatment had a significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo (median, 21.4 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.73]). With a median survival follow-up of 36.0 months, a significant improvement in overall survival was identified with toripalimab over placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.89]; 2-sided P = .008). The median overall survival was not reached in the toripalimab group, while it was 33.7 months in the placebo group. A consistent effect on overall survival, favoring toripalimab, was found in subgroups with high and low PD-L1 (programmed death–ligand 1) expression. The incidence of all adverse events, grade 3 or greater adverse events, and fatal adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. However, adverse events leading to discontinuation of toripalimab or placebo (11.6% vs 4.9%), immune-related adverse events (54.1% vs 21.7%), and grade 3 or greater immune-related adverse events (9.6% vs 1.4%) were more frequent in the toripalimab group. Conclusions and Relevance: The addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for RM-NPC provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival and overall survival benefits compared with chemotherapy alone, with a manageable safety profile. These findings support the use of toripalimab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin as the new standard of care for this patient population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03581786

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.20181

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Mai, H.-Q., Chen, Q.-Y., Chen, D., Hu, C., Yang, K., Wen, J., Li, J., Shi, Y., Jin, F., Xu, R., Pan, J., Qu, S., Li, P., Hu, C., Liu, Y.-C., Jiang, Y., He, X., Wang, H.-M., Lim, W.-T., Liao, W., He, X., Chen, X., Wang, S., Yuan, X., Li, Q., Lin, X., Jing, S., Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Hsieh, C.-Y., Yang, M.-H., Yen, C.-J., Samol, J., Luo, X., Wang, X., Tang, X., Feng, H., Yao, S., Keegan, P., & Xu, R.-H.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-11-28
Volume
330
Issue
20
Pages
1961
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4389082473
Cited by
279
References
18
FWCI
61.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: The JUPITER-02 Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2023.20181
The paper
Mai, H.-Q., Chen, Q.-Y., Chen, D., Hu, C., Yang, K., Wen, J., Li, J., Shi, Y., Jin, F., Xu, R., Pan, J., Qu, S., Li, P., Hu, C., Liu, Y.-C., Jiang, Y., He, X., Wang, H.-M., Lim, W.-T., . . . Xu, R.-H. (2023). Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: The JUPITER-02 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.20181

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.