Cited by 190Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersinterferon and immune responsesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Phase Ib study of MIW815 (ADU-S100) in combination with spartalizumab (PDR001) in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas.

Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Sandhu, Shahneen Kaur, Hamid, Omid, Spreafico, Anna, Kasper, Stefan, Dummer, Reinhard, Shimizu, Toshio, Steeghs, Neeltje +8 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

2507 Background: MIW815 (ADU-S100) is a novel synthetic cyclic dinucleotide that activates the STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING) pathway impacting tumor cells, tumor microenvironment, vasculature, tumor-associated fibroblasts, and priming APC and CD8+ T cells. Spartalizumab is a humanized IgG4 mAb that blocks the binding of PD-1 to PD-L1/2. Preclinical data support synergistic antitumor effects when MIW815 (ADU-S100) is combined with checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: In this Phase Ib dose escalation study, pts with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphoma received MIW815 (ADU-S100) (intratumoral injections [50–800 µg] either weekly [3 weeks on/1 week off] or Q4W) and spartalizumab (400 mg IV Q4W). Injected and non-injected tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and on treatment. Primary objectives are to determine safety and identify a dose/schedule for future studies. Preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) are also being explored. Results: As of Jan 11, 2019, 66 pts (median age: 61 y) with various solid tumors or lymphomas have been treated. Treatment was discontinued in 49 pts (74%) due to disease progression (n = 28), pt/physician decision (n = 18), AE (n = 2), or death (n = 1). No DLTs were reported during the first cycle at any dose level. Most common (≥5 pts) treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were injection site pain (12%), pyrexia (11%), and diarrhea (9%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs (in ≥2 pts) were increased AST and ALT (3% each). Serious TRAEs were pyrexia (3%), increased amylase, increased lipase, diarrhea, fatigue, hyperthyroidism, partial seizures, dyspnea, and pneumonitis (all 2%). Partial responses in pts with PD-1–naive TNBC and PD-1–relapsed/refractory melanoma have been observed. MIW815 (ADU-S100) plasma exposure generally increased in a dose-dependent manner with a rapid terminal half-life. Response data, PK and PD analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Thus far, MIW815 (ADU-S100) + spartalizumab has demonstrated antitumor activity in PD-1–naive TNBC and PD-1–relapsed/refractory melanoma. The combination is well tolerated, with no DLTs reported to date. The MTD has not been reached and dose escalation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03172936.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.2507

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary data showed that some combination therapies (ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab, manganese plus α-PD-1) had encouraging antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile.

    “The preliminary data showed that some combination therapies (e.g. ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab, manganese plus α-PD-1) had encouraging antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile [270, 275, 276].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meric-Bernstam, F., Sandhu, S. K., Hamid, O., Spreafico, A., Kasper, S., Dummer, R., Shimizu, T., Steeghs, N., Lewis, N., Talluto, C. C., Dolan, S., Bean, A., Brown, R., Trujillo, D., Nair, N., & Luke, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ;
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA;
  • Aduro BioTech (United States) (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
37
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
2507-2507
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2947265946
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 4
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
ADU-S100, spartalizumab, cyclic dinucleotides, STING pathway, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, combination immunotherapy, advanced solid tumors, lymphoma, dose escalation, treatment-related adverse events, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, triple-negative breast cancer, melanoma, dose-limiting toxicity, intratumoral injection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review