Cited by 150Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Relatlimab (RELA) plus nivolumab (NIVO) versus NIVO in first-line advanced melanoma: Primary phase III results from RELATIVITY-047 (CA224-047).

Lipson, Evan J., Tawbi, Hussein Abdul-Hassan, Schadendorf, Dirk, Ascierto, Paolo Antonio, Matamala, Luis, Gutiérrez, Erika Castillo, Rutkowski, Piotr, Gogas, Helen +11 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

9503 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. However, novel combinations are needed to optimize the benefit-risk profile. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) regulates an immune checkpoint pathway, which inhibits T-cell activity, and is upregulated in many tumor types including melanoma. Relatlimab (RELA), a human IgG4 LAG-3-blocking antibody, restores effector function of exhausted T cells. RELA in combination with nivolumab (NIVO; anti-programmed death [PD]-1) modulates potentially synergistic immune checkpoint pathways and can enhance antitumor immune responses. RELATIVITY-047 is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase II/III study evaluating a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of RELA+NIVO as a fixed-dose combination (FDC) treatment in first-line advanced melanoma. Methods: Patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive RELA 160 mg + NIVO 480 mg FDC intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) or NIVO monotherapy 480 mg IV Q4W, stratified by LAG-3 expression, programmed death ligand 1 expression, BRAF mutation status, and AJCC (v8) M stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response rate. PFS in prespecified subgroups and safety were additional objectives. Results: 714 patients were randomized to RELA+NIVO FDC (n = 355) or NIVO (n = 359). Patient characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. Median follow-up was 13.2 months. Median PFS in the RELA+NIVO FDC group (10.1 months [95% CI, 6.4–15.7]) was significantly longer than in the NIVO group (4.6 months [95% CI, 3.4–5.6]; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.6–0.9]; P = 0.0055). PFS rates at 12 months were 47.7% (95% CI, 41.8–53.2) and 36.0% (95% CI, 30.5–41.6) for RELA+NIVO FDC and NIVO, respectively. PFS favored RELA+NIVO FDC across key prespecified subgroups. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was higher in the RELA+NIVO FDC group (18.9%) versus NIVO (9.7%). There were 3 treatment-related deaths with RELA+NIVO FDC and 2 with NIVO. TRAEs (any grade) led to treatment discontinuation in 14.6% and 6.7% of patients in the RELA+NIVO FDC and NIVO groups, respectively. Conclusions: First-line treatment with RELA+NIVO FDC demonstrated a statistically significant PFS benefit compared to NIVO monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. RELA+NIVO FDC was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and without unexpected safety signals. This is the first phase III study of a novel FDC to demonstrate a clinically meaningful benefit by dual inhibition of the LAG-3 and PD-1 pathways. Clinical trial information: NCT03470922.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9503

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the phase 2/3 study RELATIVITY-047, relatlimab plus nivolumab therapy demonstrated a significant PFS benefit (10.1 vs. 4.6 months, HR: 0.75) in advanced melanoma, relative to nivolumab monotherapy.

    “In the phase 2/3 study RELATIVITY-047, relatlimab (α-LAG-3) plus nivolumab therapy demonstrated a significant PFS benefit (10.1 vs. 4.6 months, HR: 0.75) in advanced melanoma, relatively to nivolumab monotherapy [165].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lipson, E. J., Tawbi, H. A.-H., Schadendorf, D., Ascierto, P. A., Matamala, L., Gutiérrez, E. C., Rutkowski, P., Gogas, H., Lao, C. D., Janoski de Menezes, J., Dalle, S., Arance, A. M., Grob, J.-J., Srivastava, S., Abaskharoun, M., Simonsen, K. L., Li, B., Long, G. V., & Hodi, F. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Fundación Arturo López Pérez (CL)
  • FAICIC Clinical Research, Veracruz, Mexico;
  • The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil;
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
39
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
9503-9503
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3169720255
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 34
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
relatlimab, nivolumab, LAG-3 blockade, anti-PD-1 therapy, advanced melanoma, first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, fixed-dose combination, progression-free survival, objective response rate, overall survival, PD-L1 expression, BRAF mutation, treatment safety, T cell exhaustion, antitumor immunity, combination immunotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review