The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers
Open accessAbstract
Advances in positioning, Web mapping, cellular communications and wiki technologies have surpassed the original visions of GSDI programs around the world. By tapping the distributed knowledge, personal time and energy of volunteer contributors, GI voluntarism is beginning to relocate and redistribute selected GI productive activities from mapping agencies to networks of non-state volunteer actors. Participants in the production process are both users and producers, or ‘produsers ’ to use a recent neologism. Indeed, GI voluntarism ultimately has the potential to redistribute the rights to define and judge the value of the produced geographic information and of the new production system in general. The concept and its implementation present a rich collection of both opportunities and risks now being considered by leaders of public and private mapping organizations world-wide. In this paper, the authors describe and classify both the types of people who volunteer geospatial information and the nature of their contributions. Combining empirical research dealing with the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
O’Reilly, T. (2012) · The Social Media Reader · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764077.003.0008 · Cited by 5,601
Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6933 · Cited by 3,367
Raymond, E. (1999) · Knowledge, Technology & Policy · doi:10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0 · Cited by 2,915
Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1205 · Cited by 2,323
Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: from production to produsage
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2978 · Cited by 2,070
Coase's penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”
Benkler, Y. (2002) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/1562247 · Cited by 1,572
Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework
Sieber, R. (2006) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x · Cited by 1,210
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/985692.985765 · Cited by 768
The credibility of volunteered geographic information
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y · Cited by 751
Citizens as Voluntary Sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0
Goodchild, M. F. (2007) · Cited by 707
Cited by
Opening up Smart Cities: Citizen-Centric Challenges and Opportunities from GIScience
Degbelo, A., Granell, C., Trilles, S., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., & Kray, C. (2016) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi5020016 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, D., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J.
- Venue
- University of Twente Research Information
- Published
- 2009-04-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 332-358
- OpenAlex
- W2150130683
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 78.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2902/1725-0463.2009.04.art16
- The paper
- Coleman, D., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers. University of Twente Research Information. https://doi.org/10.2902/1725-0463.2009.04.art16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.