The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participatory GIS — a people's GIS?
Open accessAbstract
Recent years have witnessed a burgeoning of applications of GIS which grant legitimacy to indigenous geographical knowledge as well as to `official' spatial data. By incorporating various forms of community participation these newer framings of Geographical Information Systems as `Participatory GIS' (PGIS) offer a response to the critiques of GIS which were prevalent in the 1990s. This paper reviews PGIS in the context of the `democratization of GIS'. It explores aspects of the control and ownership of geographical information, representations of local and indigenous knowledge, scale and scaling up, web-based approaches and some potential future technical and academic directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time
Polanyi, K., Stiglitz, J. E., & Block, F. (1944) · Cited by 6,692
Negroponte, N., & Asher, M. (1995) · Cited by 3,037
Geographic information systems and science
(2011) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2011.582276 · Cited by 1,691
Kwan, M. (1998) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x · Cited by 1,156
Geographic information systems and science
Retalis, A. (2005) · The Photogrammetric Record · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2005.00343_5.x · Cited by 903
The Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology
Sillitoe, P. (1998) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/204722 · Cited by 708
Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research
Kwan, M.-P. (2002) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00309 · Cited by 635
Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures
Kwan, M.-P. (1999) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00158 · Cited by 603
The Electronic Journal of e-Government
(2021) · doi:10.34190/ejeg.18.1 · Cited by 555
Community participation and geographic information systems
(2002) · Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1201/9780203469484-8 · Cited by 509
Cited by
Social-media data for urban sustainability
Ilieva, R. T., & McPhearson, T. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0153-6 · Cited by 291
Álvarez Larrain, A., & McCall, M. K. (2019) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-018-9385-z · Cited by 89
The Spatial Politics of Affect and Emotion in Participatory GIS
Young, J. C., & Gilmore, M. P. (2013) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.707596 · Cited by 72
The aerial panopticon and the ethics of archaeological remote sensing in sacred cultural spaces
Davis, D. S., Buffa, D., Rasolondrainy, T., Creswell, E., Anyanwu, C., Ibirogba, A., Randolph, C., Ouarghidi, A., Phelps, L. N., Lahiniriko, F., et al. (2021) · Archaeological Prospection · doi:10.1002/arp.1819 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, C. E.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 616-637
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2137628602
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 85.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132507081493
- The paper
- Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.