Cited by 675Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyUsability and User Interface DesignData Visualization and Analytics

Designing for Situation Awareness

Endsley, Mica R., Bolte, Betty, Jones, Debra G.·2003·CRC Press eBooks

Abstract

Enhancing Situation Awareness (SA) is a major design goal for projects in many fields, including aviation, ground transportation, air traffic control, nuclear power, and medicine, but little information exists in an integral format to support this goal. Designing for Situation Awareness helps designers understand how people acquire and inte

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9780203485088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Endsley, M. R., Bolte, B., & Jones, D. G.
Venue
CRC Press eBooks
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2003-07-17
OpenAlex
W2738487222
Cited by
675
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 29
FWCI
15.65
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
situational awareness, human factors, human-computer interaction, aviation, air traffic control, nuclear energy, medical systems, transport systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review