Cited by 51Tactile and Sensory InteractionsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

- Sensory Substitution of Vision: Importance of Perceptual and Cognitive Processing

Jack M. Loomis, Roberta L. Klatzky, Nicholas A. Giudice·2018·Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision

Abstract

Introduction ......................................................................................................... 161 General-Purpose and Special-Purpose Sensory Substitution ....................... 163 Theoretical Framework for Special-Purpose Sensory Substitution ............. 164 Step 1: Identifying Informational Requirements for a Task ..................... 164 Step 2: Coupling Task Information with the Substituting Modalities ........................................................................................................ 165 Bases for Sensory Substitution .......................................................................... 170 Functional Equivalence through Spatial Isomorphism ............................ 171 Functional Equivalence through Amodal Representations ..................... 173 Synesthesia: Exploiting Natural Correspondences ................................... 175 Rote Learning .................................................................................................. 177 Cortical Plasticity............................................................................................ 178 Image Preprocessing and Artificial Intelligence ........................................ 179 Implications of Processing Differences between Blind and Sighted People ..................................................................................................... 180 Recommendations for the Design Process ..............................................…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781315216935-12

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Giudice, N. A.
Venue
Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2018-09-03
Pages
179-210
OpenAlex
W2953801042
Cited by
51
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
sensory substitution, vision loss, blind people, low vision, amodal representation, synesthesia, rote learning, cortical plasticity, image preprocessing, assistive technology design, visual perception, echolocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review