The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Comparisons Using R
Abstract
Adopting a unifying theme based on maximum statistics, Multiple Comparisons Using R describes the common underlying theory of multiple comparison procedures through numerous examples. It also presents a detailed description of available software implementations in R. The R packages and source code for the analyses are available at https://CRAN.R-pro
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After applying the Bonferroni correction for evaluating multiple probabilities (Bretz et al. 2010), only the projections of areas 7A and DP to area 10 were inconsistent despite a statistically very low probability of being so.”
From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Bretz et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. H. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425 · Cited by 13,950
Self-citationGentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,747
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
Dunnett, C. W. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 · Cited by 6,097
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Storey, J. D. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 · Cited by 5,603
A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials
O'Brien, P. C., & Fleming, T. R. (1979) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530245 · Cited by 3,311
Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
Šidák, Z. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935 · Cited by 2,904
An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
SIMES, R. J. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.3.751 · Cited by 2,396
Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials
GORDON LAN, K. K., & DEMETS, D. L. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.3.659 · Cited by 2,310
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Fülöpová, N., Brückner, K., Muselík, J., Pavloková, S., & Franc, A. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124991 · Cited by 8
Ferreira, J. D. S., Crisóstomo, C., Marques, N. M., Corrêa, L. D. S., González, A. L., Asensio, L. A. B., Casanova‐Lugo, F., & da Costa, R. L. D. (2025) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106547 · Cited by 8
Identifying priority heat-risk areas in Granada, Spain, using InVEST and landscape metrics
Silveira, C., Pistón, N., Martínez‐López, J., Alcaraz‐Segura, D., Postma, T., Torralbo, J. L., & Zamora, R. (2025) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128794 · Cited by 8
Spatiotemporal integration of tactile patterns along and across fingers
Trojan, J., Heil, M., Maihöfner, C., Hölzl, R., Kleinböhl, D., Flor, H., & Benrath, J. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.019 · Cited by 8
Andersen, J., Strandberg‐Larsen, K., Gerds, T. A., Gislason, G., Torp-Pedersen, C. T., Blanche, P., Andersson, C., Køber, L., Fosbøl, E. L., Phelps, M. D., et al. (2021) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-215133 · Cited by 8
Case study of a rhizosphere microbiome assay on a bamboo rhizome with excessive shoots
Cui, F., Yang, Y., Ye, M., Wei, W., Huang, W., Wu, Y., Xi, J., Ye, X., Zhou, S., Hu, Z., et al. (2021) · Forestry Research · doi:10.48130/fr-2021-0010 · Cited by 8
Rupp, C., Westreicher‐Kristen, E., & Susenbeth, A. (2021) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115115 · Cited by 8
Testing three hypotheses of rarity among the Buprestidae species of a tropical dry forest
Reyes‐González, R., Toledo‐Hernández, V. H., Flores‐Palacios, A., Rös, M., Bueno-Villegas, J., & Corona‐López, A. M. (2021) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.13110 · Cited by 9
“All analyses were performed in R 3.6.1 and the only library used was multcomp (multiple comparisons methods; Bretz et al., 2010).”
MethodInfluentialReduction in caffeine withdrawal after open-label decaffeinated coffee
Mills, L., Lee, J. C., Boakes, R. A., & Colagiuri, B. (2023) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811221147152 · Cited by 7
“Contrasts were estimated using estimated marginal means, and multiple comparisons controlled for Type-1 error via the Westfall procedure (Bretz et al., 2016; Westfall & Young, 1993).”
MethodHaedo, J. P., Graffigna, S., Martínez, L. C., Pérez‐Méndez, N., Torretta, J. P., & Marrero, H. J. (2023) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2023.108417 · Cited by 8
A comparative evaluation of the safety performance of bus priority route configurations
Gitelman, V., & Doveh, E. (2023) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-023-00589-y · Cited by 8
“For that, we applied least-squares means differences with a Bonferroni adjustment to control for multiple comparisons [3].”
MethodLeaf wettability is the main driver for foliar P uptake in P-deficient maize
Henningsen, J. N., Görlach, B. M., Quintero, J. M., Recena, R., Mühling, K. H., & Fernández, V. (2023) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108170 · Cited by 8
Simon, A., Lippemeier, S., Mueller, J., Schlachter, M., Kaiser, F., & Schulz, C. (2024) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741311 · Cited by 9
Dietary Zinc Limitation Dictates Lifespan and Reproduction Trade‐Offs of Drosophila Mothers
Sarmah, S., Truong, H. T. H., McColl, G., Burke, R., Mirth, C. K., & Piper, M. D. W. (2025) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.14498 · Cited by 8
Childhood lung function and the association with β2‐adrenergic receptor haplotypes
Torjussen, T. M., Munthe‐Kaas, M. C., Mowinckel, P., Carlsen, K., Undlien, D. E., & Carlsen, K. C. L. (2013) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.12221 · Cited by 8
“Possible gene–environment interactions were tested in logistic regression models, and correction for multiple testing in these analyses was performed by Hommels procedure (23).”
MethodThe effect of hospital teaching status on outcomes in bariatric surgery
Inaba, C. S., Koh, C. Y., Sujatha-Bhaskar, S., Lee, Y., Pejcinovska, M., & Nguyen, N. T. (2017) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2017.07.021 · Cited by 8
Benda, N., & Brandt, A. (2017) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2017.1378669 · Cited by 8
“Considerable advances in methodological research resulted in a large number of choices to account for multiplicity, see, for example, Bauer (1991), Bretz et al. (2010), Dmitrienko et al. (2010), Bretz et al. (2011), Alosh et al. (2014), offering the option to make clinical development either more…”
BackgroundDoes a higher content of fibre in the piglet diet have an influence on tail biting in growing pigs?
Naya, A., Gertz, M., Hasler, M., Beilage, E. G., & Krieter, J. (2019) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.03.010 · Cited by 8
Montory, J. A., Cumillaf, J. P., Gebauer, P., Urbina, M. A., Cubillos, V. M., Navarro, J. M., Marín, S. L., & Cruces, E. (2020) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105154 · Cited by 8
Cabrieto, J., Meers, K., Schat, E., Adolf, J., Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., & Ceulemans, E. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01603-8 · Cited by 8
“Users can obviously use these p -values to implement alternative correction methods if they wish (for an overview see e.g., Bretz et al., 2016).”
MethodJavorcikova, Z., Dangoisse, M., Nikis, S., Lechat, J.-P., Gillain, A., Fils, J., & der Linden, P. V. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05814-4 · Cited by 8
Pitchford, J. L., Cressman, K. A., Cherry, J. A., Russell, B. T., McIlwain, J., Archer, M. J., & Underwood, W. V. (2022) · Wetlands Ecology and Management · doi:10.1007/s11273-022-09871-7 · Cited by 8
“To compare mean rates of change for zones, we constructed 95% confidence intervals 156 using the function ‘glht’ in the R package ‘multcomp’ to adjust p-values and confidence intervals to control the 157 family-wise error rate (Hothorn et al. 2008; Bretz et al. 2010).”
MethodChieppa, J., Power, S. A., Nielsen, U. N., & Tissue, D. T. (2022) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4156 · Cited by 8
The population-wise error rate for clinical trials with overlapping populations
Brannath, W., Hillner, C., & Rohmeyer, K. (2022) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802221135249 · Cited by 8
Castracani, C., Giannetti, D., Spotti, F. A., Schifani, E., Ghizzoni, M., Delaiti, M., Penner, F., Leonardi, S., Mori, A., Ioriatti, C., et al. (2022) · Agricultural and Forest Entomology · doi:10.1111/afe.12547 · Cited by 8
“To compare methods (Ant vs. Leaf ) in different dates and in different treatments (Experimental vs. Control vines), an approach which corrects for multiple comparisons was used (Bretz et al., 2011), that is, the ghlt function of the mulcomp package with ad-hoc set of contrasts.”
MethodTakagi, E. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10274 · Cited by 8
Hébert‐Losier, K., & Holmberg, H. (2013) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182a993a0 · Cited by 8
Jamshidian, M., & Yuan, K. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949655.2012.660486 · Cited by 8
Factors influencing the feeding response of laboratory-reared Aedes aegypti.
Phasomkusolsil, S., Pantuwatana, K., Tawong, J., Khongtak, W., Monkanna, N., Kertmanee, Y., Damdangdee, N., McCardle, P. W., & Schuster, A. L. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 8
Klatt, S. F., von Danwitz, A., Hasler, M., & Susenbeth, A. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.10.015 · Cited by 8
Spiny Prey, Fortunate Prey. Dorsal Spines Are an Asset in Intraguild Interactions among Lady Beetles
Hautier, L., Martin, G. S., Jansen, J., Branquart, É., & Grégoire, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00135 · Cited by 8
“All pairwise comparisons were then performed with multiplicity adjusted Pvalues based on the underlying multivariate normal distribution, thus accounting for the correlation between the tests (multcomp R package; Bretz et al., 2010).”
MethodD’Souza, S., Underwood, L., Peterson, E. R., Morton, S., & Waldie, K. E. (2020) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-019-00953-x · Cited by 9
An evaluation of methods for testing hypotheses relating to two endpoints in a single clinical trial
Su, T., Glimm, E., Whitehead, J., & Branson, M. (2012) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.504 · Cited by 8
Informative Simultaneous Confidence Intervals in Hierarchical Testing
Brannath, W., & Schmidt, S. (2014) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me13-01-0140 · Cited by 8
The impact of perceived emotions on toddlers' word learning
Ma, L., Twomey, K. E., & Westermann, G. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13799 · Cited by 7
Zhai, Z., Lin, L., Li, T., Bu, Z., & Wang, M. (2025) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-024-00948-3 · Cited by 7
Bärmann, L., Kaufmann, S., & Hauck, M. (2025) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122499 · Cited by 7
Two cowpea Rubisco activase isoforms for crop thermotolerance
Gjindali, A., Page, R., Ashton, C. J., Robertson, I. H., Page, M. T., Bloemers, D., Gould, P. D., Worrall, D., Orr, D. J., & Carmo‐Silva, E. (2025) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.70271 · Cited by 7
“Compact letter display was generated after the post hoc pairwise comparisons using packages MULTICOMP (Bretz et al ., 2016) and MULTICOMPVIEW (Graves et al ., 2019).”
Ashbury, A. M., Lamarque, F., Permana, A., Rahmaeti, T., Samson, D. R., Utami-Atmoko, S. S., Crofoot, M. C., & Schuppli, C. (2025) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.053 · Cited by 7
The function of root mat fungal communities: Changes in response to pH and phosphorus addition
Burke, D. J., Carrino‐Kyker, S. R., Chervenak, C. F., Hoke, A. J., & Hewins, C. R. (2021) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10193 · Cited by 7
“Tukey's tests for multiple comparisons were conducted as post- hoc tests with the function ghlt in the package multcomp (v 1.4– 2; Hothorn et al., 2008; Bretz et al., 2011).”
MethodInfluentialNyameasem, J. K., Halima, E. B., Malisch, C. S., Razavi, B. S., Taube, F., & Reinsch, T. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11101936 · Cited by 7
Maruyama, T. E., Tsuruta, M., Ueno, S., Kawakami, K., Bamba, Y., & Moriguchi, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.825340 · Cited by 7
Dimension-wise scaled normal mixtures with application to finance and biometry
Punzo, A., & Bagnato, L. (2022) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2022.105020 · Cited by 7
Impacts of land use change on native plant-butterfly interaction networks from central Mexico
Muñoz-Galicia, D., Lara, C., Castillo‐Guevara, C., Cuautle, M., & Rodríguez-Flores, C. I. (2023) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16205 · Cited by 9
“Post-hoc test were performed using the glht function of the package multcomp ( Bretz, Hothorn & Westfall, 2010 ).”
MethodSocial play and affiliation as possible coping strategies in a group of Maremmana beef cattle
Francesconi, M., Pedruzzi, L., Bagnato, S., Goracci, J., Ripamonti, A., Mele, M. L., & Palagi, E. (2023) · Journal of Ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-023-00801-5 · Cited by 7
Wielkopolan, B., Szabelska‐Beręsewicz, A., Gawor, J., & Obrępalska‐Stęplowska, A. (2024) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.13247 · Cited by 7
“Next, the multiple comparisons procedure based on Tukey ’ s test (Bretz et al., 2010) implemented in R package multcomp (Hothorn et al., 2008) was applied to obtain the information on which levels of active substance and concentration are significantly different from each other.”
MethodSmiling underwater: Exploring playful signals and rapid mimicry in bottlenose dolphins
Maglieri, V., Vantaggio, F., Pilenga, C., Böye, M., Lemasson, A., Favaro, L., & Palagi, E. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110966 · Cited by 7
“104 Weperformedallpairwisecomparisonsforthelevelsofthemulti-levelfactorwiththe Tukey test 105 by using the R package emmeans .”
Yoshino, K., Katano, T., Ito, Y., Hamada, T., Fujii, N., & Hayami, Y. (2014) · Plankton and Benthos Research · doi:10.3800/pbr.9.57 · Cited by 7
Directional Error Rates of Closed Testing Procedures
Westfall, P. H., Bretz, F., & Tobias, R. D. (2013) · Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1080/19466315.2013.818575 · Cited by 7
Self-citationEpistemic signals and emoticons affect kudos
Vogel, C. M., & Sanchez, L. M. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications · doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2012.6422036 · Cited by 7
Censier, F., Heuskin, S., Martin, G. S., Michels, F., Fauconnier, M., Proft, M. D., Lognay, G. C., & Bodson, B. (2015) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2015.10.024 · Cited by 7
On French listeners’ ability to use stress during spoken word processing
Michelas, A., Esteve‐Gibert, N., & Dufour, S. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1394862 · Cited by 7
“comp package (Bretz et al., 2011) with p-values adjusted by the single step method.”
MethodExperiential Statistics Learning with RStudio: Study on Students’ Engagement
Salim, N. R., Gopal, K., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2018) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012039 · Cited by 7
Statistical analysis of spatial segregation of points
Sadahiro, Y. (2019) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.04.008 · Cited by 7
Hernández‐Flores, J., Flores‐Palacios, A., Vásquez‐Bolaños, M., Toledo‐Hernández, V. H., Sotelo‐Caro, O., & Robles, M. I. R. (2020) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/icad.12466 · Cited by 7
In-situ soil greenhouse gas fluxes under different cryptogamic covers in maritime Antarctica.
Durán, J., Rodríguez, A., Fangueiro, D., & Ríos, A. D. D. L. (2021) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144557 · Cited by 5
Investigating the chronological reduction potential of a urease inhibitor in respiration chambers
Bobrowski, A. B., Derno, M., Kuhla, B., Hagenkamp-Korth, F., Hasler, M., & Hartung, E. (2021) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.01.005 · Cited by 7
Ripa, R. R., Franzese, J., Premoli, A. C., & Raffaele, E. (2022) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-022-09928-8 · Cited by 6
Seibel, H., Krassilnikova, K., Fichtner‐Grabowski, F., Rebl, A., Schulz, C., & Hornburg, S. C. (2022) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/are.15928 · Cited by 7
Raver, A., Lindholm, T., Gustafsson, P. U., & Alm, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822 · Cited by 7
“, 2017) to use Satterthwaite’s method for approximating degrees of freedom for the t-tests, and AICcmodavg (Mazerolle, 2020) for model selection using Akaike weights (see Burnham and Anderson, 2002; Wagenmakers and Farrell, 2004); the Holm correction with multcomp (Bretz et al., 2016); the intra-class correlation coef…”
MethodShrubs versus ‘gullivers’: woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands
Hermann, J., Haug, S., Pillar, V. D., & Pfadenhauer, J. (2012) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1007/s11258-012-0131-4 · Cited by 7
“Tukey test for all pairwise comparisons in a linear mixed model (Bretz et al. 2011).”
MethodMiller, D. J., Koçak, F., & Kesidis, G. (2012) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2012.6349793 · Cited by 7
“when, for some (currently undetected) samples, they yield lower p-values (corrected for multiple testing [6]) than those yielded by the existing test cadre on all (currently undetected) samples in the batch.”
BackgroundSouna, D. A., Bokonon-Ganta, A. H., Ravallec, M., Cusumano, A., Pittendrigh, B. R., Volkoff, A., & Tamò, M. (2017) · Psyche A Journal of Entomology · doi:10.1155/2017/3156534 · Cited by 7
“Multiple comparisons were carried out using the glht function of the “multcomp” package in the R software [20] to determine significant differences among the mean number of ovarioles per female (at the 0.”
MethodSteingrimsson, J. A., Betz, J., Qian, T., & Rosenblum, M. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxz030 · Cited by 7
Khan, M. A. S. A., Vetter, V. M. S., Reshi, Z. A., Dar, P., & Jentsch, A. (2018) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/plb.12710 · Cited by 7
Salinity affects growth but not thermal preference of adult mummichogs Fundulus heteroclitus
Thompson, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.14103 · Cited by 7
Disproportionate Changes in the CH4 Emissions of Six Water Table Levels in an Alpine Peatland
Yan, L., Zhang, X., Wu, H., Kang, E., Li, Y., Wang, J., Yan, Z., Zhang, K., & Kang, X. (2020) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos11111165 · Cited by 7
Galletti, M. F. B. M., Paddock, C. D., Hecht, J. A., Biggerstaff, B. J., Ritter, J. M., & Karpathy, S. E. (2021) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00626-20 · Cited by 7
Gou, J. (2021) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.202000081 · Cited by 7
“Besides the marginal power, disjunctive power and conjunctive power discussed in Dmitrienko et al. (2009), Bretz et al. (2010), Zhang and Gou (2016) and Vickerstaff et al. (2019) can also be considered for the sample size calculation.”
BackgroundUzkiaga, N., Gebauer, P., Niklitschek, E. J., Montory, J. A., Paschke, K. A., Garcés, C., & Lázaro, O. D. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151730 · Cited by 7
Comparison of fire-produced gases from wind tunnel and small field experimental burns
Weise, D. R., Hao, W. M., Baker, S., Princevac, M., Aminfar, A., Palarea‐Albaladejo, J., Ottmar, R. D., Hudak, A. T., Restaino, J. C., & O’Brien, J. J. (2022) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf21141 · Cited by 7
Reducing unnecessary measurements in clinical trials with multiple primary endpoints
Sozu, T., Sugimoto, T., & Hamasaki, T. (2015) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2015.1052497 · Cited by 6
“…under the unstructured Bonferroni procedure can be written as 1 β ¼ Pr [K k¼1 Zk > zα=K H1 " # ¼ 1 Pr \K k¼1 Zk zα=K H1 " # ¼ 1 Pr \K k¼1 Z k c k H1 " # : This overall power is referred to as “minimal power” (Westfall et al., 2011) or “disjunctive power” (Senn and Bretz, 2007; Bretz et al., 2011).”
Pecoraro, F., Giannini, M., Beccari, G., Covarelli, L., Filippini, G., Pisi, A., Nipoti, P., & Prodi, A. (2018) · Agricultural and Food Science · doi:10.23986/afsci.67704 · Cited by 7
Males increase their fitness by choosing large females in the common bedbug Cimex lectularius
Kaufmann, E., & Otti, O. (2018) · Animal Biology · doi:10.1163/15707563-20181033 · Cited by 7
“For those tests, the P values were adjusted to the method by Westfall (Bretz et al., 2010).”
MethodAraujo, E. S., Paiva, L. R., Alves, S. G., Bevacqua, D., Nava, D. E., Lavigne, C., & García, F. R. M. (2019) · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5424/sjar/2019171-13294 · Cited by 7
“, 2015), Multcomp (Bretz et al., 2010) and DHARMa (Hartig, 2016).”
MethodInfluentialOptimality of syntactic dependency distances
Ferrer Cancho, R., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., Esteban Ángeles, J. L., & Alemany-Puig, L. (2022) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.014308 · Cited by 39
McMahan (2017) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20260861 · Cited by 7
Ο’Loughlin, J., Linke, A. M., Toal, G., & Bakke, K. M. (2023) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.103014 · Cited by 6
Jeune, N., Juhel, J., Dessus, P., & Atal, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1368565 · Cited by 6
Capogna, E., Sørensen, Ø., Watne, L. O., Roe, J. M., Strømstad, M., Idland, A., Halaas, N. B., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Walhovd, K. B., et al. (2024) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.12.009 · Cited by 9
“If the output was significant, we applied multiple comparisons of means, as implemented in the multcomp R-package (Westfall et al., 2010), that displayed the adjusted p-values, using a single-step method.”
The Need for Nuance in the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Debate
Häggström, O. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416668233 · Cited by 6
Novák, M., & Jakubec, P. (2024) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae045 · Cited by 6
Wang, H. G., Liu, T., Sun, S., Lewis, O. T., & Xi, X. (2024) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.14191 · Cited by 6
Prigot‐Maurice, C., de Araujo, A. C., Durand, S., Laverré, T., Pigeault, R., Verdon, J., Bulet, P., Beltran‐Bech, S., & Braquart‐Varnier, C. (2019) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2019.107278 · Cited by 6
Ranger, J. J., Bonnaud, P., Santenoise, P., Zeller, B., Nourrisson, G., Pelletier, M., Gelhaye, D., & Legout, A. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119538 · Cited by 6
“(cid:30) When ((cid:26)) was declared significant (p ≤ 0.05), a Tukey’s multiple comparison of means (Hothorn et al. 2008, Bretz et al. 2011) was applied to model (1) to identify for which pair of treatments the variable distribution was significantly different.”
MethodInfluentialMillán, J., & Becker, D. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11092708 · Cited by 6
Chauliac, M., Catrysse, L., Gijbels, D., Mæyer, S. D., & Donche, V. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2022.2052696 · Cited by 6
Martínez, C., Maurits, N. M., & Maassen, B. (2022) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/02656590221139232 · Cited by 6
“For this purpose, we used the function ‘lsmeans’ (lsmeans package; Bretz et al., 2010) for pairwise comparison, applying the Tukey test.”
MethodGhisi, T., Fischer, M., Kowalska, N., Jocher, G., Orság, M., Bláhová, M., Nieto, H., Homolová, L., Žalud, Z., & Trnka, M. (2023) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120828 · Cited by 6
Nardi, C., Rech, C., de Oliveira, J. R. F., Peñaflor, M. F. G. V., Santos, F., & Bento, J. M. S. (2023) · Arthropod-Plant Interactions · doi:10.1007/s11829-023-09972-x · Cited by 6
Tapping into the human spinal locomotor centres with transspinal stimulation
Σκιαδόπουλος, Α., & Knikou, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56579-0 · Cited by 6
“Linear mixed-effects models followed by a generalized linear hypothesis test for planned contrasts were used to compare transspinal stimulation groups with the control group, as well as their interaction (sub-threshold vs. supra-threshold, 15 vs. 30 Hz, 15 vs. 50 Hz, 30 vs. 50 Hz) 56,57 .”
MethodThe Case of Watson vs. James: Effect-Priming Studies Do Not Support Ideomotor Theory
Cox, R. F. A., & Hasselman, F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054094 · Cited by 6
“simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses [29]) of the CE (Latency of IC trials.”
BackgroundZhang, Y., Zhang, S., Ma, K., Fu, B., & Anand, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115038 · Cited by 6
“The Tukey test was used for all pairwise comparisons [45].”
MethodLow Ability of Great Tits to Discriminate Similarly Inconspicuous Edible and Inedible Prey
Karlíková, Z., Veselý, P., Beránková, J., & Fuchs, R. (2016) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12454 · Cited by 6
Suzuki, H., Hirose, D., & Yamaoka, Y. (2018) · Mycoscience · doi:10.1016/j.myc.2018.04.001 · Cited by 6
Chavalle, S., Censier, F., Martin, G. S., & Proft, M. D. (2018) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2018.10.010 · Cited by 6
Testing and ranking on round-robin design for data sport analytics with application to basketball
Corain, L., Arboretti, R., Ceccato, R., Ronchi, F., & Salmaso, L. (2018) · Statistical Modelling · doi:10.1177/1471082x18808630 · Cited by 6
Floro, D. (2019) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.11.019 · Cited by 6
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Exposure Assessment in a Refractory Brick Production
Sartorelli, P., Paolucci, V., Aprea, M. C., Cenni, A., Pedersini, P., & Barabesi, L. (2019) · Annals of Work Exposures and Health · doi:10.1093/annweh/wxz078 · Cited by 6
Habitat mosaic of gravel pit as a potential refuge for carabids: a case study from Central Europe
Růžičková, J., & Hykel, M. (2019) · Community Ecology · doi:10.1556/168.2019.20.3.1 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2016-04-19
- OpenAlex
- W396053900
- Cited by
- 1,233
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 78
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Thammasat University Digital Collections (submittedVersion)
- TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Data Analysis with R
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- multiple comparisons, R software, statistical software implementation, hypothesis testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review