Cited by 105Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationPublic Policy and Administration ResearchSocial Science and Policy Research

Decision Making in Interdisciplinary Studies

Newell, William·2006·Public Administration and Public Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781420016918.ch13

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newell, W.
Corresponding author
Newell, William
Venue
Public Administration and Public Policy
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2006-11
Pages
245-264
ISSN
2155-0557 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2478146678
Cited by
105
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.40
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public administration and public policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
decision-making, interdisciplinary research, public administration, public policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review