Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology

·2001·CRC Press eBooks

Abstract

General Introduction to Species Sensitivity Distributions, L. Posthuma, T.P. Traas, and G.W. Suter II North American History of Species Sensitivity Distributions, G. W. Suter II European History of Species Sensitivity Distributions, N. M. van Straalen, K. J. van Leeuwen Theory of Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions, Nico M. van Straalen Normal Species Sensitivity Distributions and Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment, T. Aldenberg, J. S. Jaworska, and T. P. Traas Extrapolation Factors for Tiny Toxicity Data Sets from Species Sensitivity Distributions with Known Standard Deviation, T. Aldenberg and R. Luttik Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecological Risk Assessment: Distributional Assumptions, Alternate Bootstrap Techniques, and Estimation of Adequate Number of Species, M. C. Newman, D. R. Ownby, L. C.A. Mezin, D. C. Powell, T. R.L. Christensen, S. B. Lerberg, B.-A. Anderson, and T. V. Padma Observed Regularities in SSDs for Aquatic Species, D. de Zwart The Value of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Concept for Predicting Field Effects: (Non-)Confirmation of the Concept Using Semi-Field Experiments, P. J. Van den Brink, T. C.M. Brock and L. Posthuma Effects Assessment of Fabric Softeners: The DHTDMAC-Case, K. J. van Leeuwen, J. Jaworska of Species Sensitivity Distributions in the Derivation of Water Quality Criteria for Aquatic life by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, C. E. Stephan Environmental Risk Limits in the Netherlands, D. T.H.M. Sijm, A. P. van Wezel, and T. Crommentuijn A Rank-Based Approach to Deriving Canadian Soil and Sediment Quality Guidelines, C. Gaudet, D. Bright, K. Adare, and K. Potter Ecotoxicological Soil Quality Criteria in Denmark, J. J. Scott-Fordsmand, and J. Jensen Probabilistic Risk Assessment Using Species Sensitivity Distributions, K.R. Solomon and P. Takacs The Potentially Affected Fraction as a Measure of Ecological Risk, T. P. Traas, D. Van de Meent, L. Posthuma, T. H.M. Hamers, B. J. Kater, D. de Zwart, and T. Aldenberg Methodology for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment, W. J. Warren-Hicks, B. R. Parkhurst, and J. B. Butcher Toxicity-Based Assessment of Water Quality, D. de Zwart and A. Sterkenburg Mapping Risks of Heavy Metals to Birds and Mammals Using Species Sensitivity Distributions, T. P. Traas, R. Luttik, and H. Mensink Ecotoxicological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment, M. Huijbregts, D. van de Meent, M. Goedkoop, and R. Spriensma Issues and Practices in the Derivation and of Species Sensitivity Distributions, G. W. Suter II, T. P. Traas, and L. Posthuma Conceptual and Technical Outlook on Species Sensitivity Distributions, L. Posthuma, T. P. Traas, D. de Zwart, and G. W. Suter II Appendix A: The Interactive Poster Session Use of Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology, T. H.M. Hamers, T. P. Traas, and L. Posthuma Appendix B: List of programs References Glossary Acronyms Subject Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781420032314

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,161

Metadata

Venue
CRC Press eBooks
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2001-12-20
OpenAlex
W652812635
Cited by
1,161
References
0
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781420032314
The paper
Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. (2001). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.