The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Biology of Weed Control
Abstract
The vast commercial effort to utilize chemical and molecular tools to solve weed control problems has had a major impact on the basic biological sciences as well as benefits to agriculture, and the first generation of transgenic products has been successful, while somewhat crude. More sophisticated products are envisaged and expected. Biotechnologically-derived herbicide-resistant crops have been a considerable benefit, yet in some cases there is a risk that the same useful transgenes may introgress into related weeds, specifically the weeds that are hardest to control without such transgenic crops. Biotechnology can also be used to mitigate the risks. Molecular tools should be considered for weed control without the use of, or with less chemicals, whether by enhancing crop competitiveness with weeds for light, nutrients and water, or via allelochemicals. Biocontrol agents may become more effective as well as more safe when rendered hypervirulent yet non-spreading by biotechnology. There might be ways to disperse deleterious transposons throughout weed populations, obviating the need to modify the crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology
HOLM, L. G., PLUCKNETT, D. L., PANCHO, J. V., HERBEBGEB, J. S., HILBIG, W., & Halle, S. (1978) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/s0031-4056(23)00601-7 · Cited by 2,505
‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators
Peng, J., Richards, D. E., Hartley, N. M., Murphy, G. P., Devos, K. M., Flintham, J. E., Beales, J., Fish, L. J., Worland, A. J., Pelica, F., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22307 · Cited by 2,252
Tomlin, C. (2003) · Cited by 2,031
Baker, H. G. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245 · Cited by 1,586
CHROMOSOME ORGANIZATION AND GENIC EXPRESSION
McClintock, B. (1951) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.004 · Cited by 1,203
Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice
Khush, G. S. (1997) · Oryza: From Molecule to Plant · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5794-0_3 · Cited by 957
Corriveau, J. L., & Coleman, A. W. (1988) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11219.x · Cited by 848
Michel, H., & Deisenhofer, J. (1988) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00401a001 · Cited by 794
Cited by
Environmental Risks of Large Scale Cultivation of Microalgae: Mitigation of Spills
Gressel, J., van der Vlugt, C. J. B., & Bergmans, H. E. N. (2013) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2013.04.002 · Cited by 55
Self-citationHow well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance?
Gressel, J., Gassmann, A. J., & Owen, M. D. (2017) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4425 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gressel, J.
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2002-03-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 355-82; discussion 353
- OpenAlex
- W1575843088
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 76
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Biology of Weed Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781482264708
- The paper
- Gressel, J. (2002). Molecular Biology of Weed Control. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482264708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
