The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RAPID SCREENING METHOD TO DETECT POTENTIAL BIPARENTAL INHERITANCE OF PLASTID DNA AND RESULTS FOR OVER 200 ANGIOSPERM SPECIES
Abstract
We have developed a diagnostic method to screen rapidly for plant species potentially capable of biparental inheritance of plastid DNA using the DNA fluorochrome 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) in conjunction with epifluorescence microscopy. Pollen shed from 235 plant species (including about 50 of agronomic importance) representing 80 families were screened. Putative plastid DNA was detected in the generative and/or sperm cells of pollen from 26 genera (43 species) representing 15 families. Plastid DNA was not detected in the generative or sperm cells of pollen from 192 plant species, thereby strongly suggesting that these species have only maternal inheritance. Our cytological diagnosis corroborated the known genetic evidence in 42 plant species and conflicted with the genetic reports in five species, which are discussed. The data suggest that biparental inheritance of plastids is rare; overall, it may occur in about 14% of flowering plant genera, examples of which are scattered among 19% of the families examined. This methodology also readily reveals whether pollen is bi‐ or trinucleate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williamson, D. H., & Fennell, D. J. (1975) · Methods in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60963-2 · Cited by 360
Elimination of plastids during spermatogenesis and fertilization in the plant kingdom
Sears, B. B. (1980) · Plasmid · doi:10.1016/0147-619x(80)90063-3 · Cited by 264
Coleman, A. W., Maguire, M. J., & Coleman, J. R. (1981) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/29.8.6168681 · Cited by 238
Self-citationColeman, A. W., & Goff, L. J. (1985) · Stain Technology · doi:10.3109/10520298509113905 · Cited by 186
Self-citationHereditary and Pathogenic Nature of Mutant Mitochondria in Nepeta 2
Woods, M. W., & duBuy, H. G. (1951) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/11.6.1105 · Cited by 36
Cited by
The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function
Wicke, S., Schneeweiss, G. M., dePamphilis, C. W., Müller, K. F., & Quandt, D. (2011) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 · Cited by 1,624
Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants
Ouborg, N. J., Piquot, Y., & Van Groenendael, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00389.x · Cited by 476
Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives
Stewart, C. N., Halfhill, M. D., & Warwick, S. I. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1179 · Cited by 431
Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., & Sodmergen (2003) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcg121 · Cited by 305
A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating Gene Flow from Genetic Markers
Neigel, J. E. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.105 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Corriveau, J. L., & Coleman, A. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1443-1458
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2049122334
- Cited by
- 848
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RAPID SCREENING METHOD TO DETECT POTENTIAL BIPARENTAL INHERITANCE OF PLASTID DNA AND RESULTS FOR OVER 200 ANGIOSPERM SPECIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11219.x
- The paper
- Corriveau, J. L., & Coleman, A. W. (1988). RAPID SCREENING METHOD TO DETECT POTENTIAL BIPARENTAL INHERITANCE OF PLASTID DNA AND RESULTS FOR OVER 200 ANGIOSPERM SPECIES. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11219.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
