The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Bases of Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine
Abstract
Examining the strengths and limitations of various standards of accuracy in clinical laboratory analyses, this detailed reference presents an in-depth study of important theoretical and empirical issues concerning the description, collection, and application of reference values in laboratory medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867
Thyroid disease in pregnancy: new insights in diagnosis and clinical management
Korevaar, T. I. M., Medici, M., Visser, T. J., & Peeters, R. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.93 · Cited by 441
Cardiac Output and Central Distribution of Blood Flow in the Human Fetus
Mielke, G., & Benda, N. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.12.1662 · Cited by 345
A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation
Horn, P. S., Pesce, A. J., & Copeland, B. E. (1998) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/44.3.622 · Cited by 272
Reference intervals: the way forward
Ceriotti, F., Hinzmann, R., & Panteghini, M. (2009) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008170 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, E. K., & Boyd, J. C.
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 1995-07-07
- OpenAlex
- W1589635113
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Bases of Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781482273151
- The paper
- Harris, E. K., & Boyd, J. C. (1995). Statistical Bases of Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482273151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
