The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation
Abstract
We propose a new methodology for the estimation of reference intervals for data sets with small numbers of observations or for those with substantial numbers of outliers. We propose a prediction interval that uses robust estimates of location and scale. The SAS software can be readily modified to do these calculations. We compared four reference interval procedures (nonparametric, transformed, robust with a nonparametric lower limit, and transformed robust) for sample sizes of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 from χ2 distributions of 1, 4, 7, and 10 df. χ2 distributions were chosen because they simulate the skewness of distributions often found in clinical chemistry populations. We used the root mean square error as the measure of performance and used computer simulation to calculate this measure. The robust estimator showed the best performance for small sample sizes. As the sample size increased, the performance values converged. The robust method for calculating upper reference interval values yields reasonable results. In two examples using real data for haptoglobin and glucose, the robust estimator provides slightly smaller upper reference limits than the other procedures. Lastly, the robust estimator was compared with the other procedures in a population where 5% of the values were multiplied by a factor of 5. The reference intervals were calculated with and without outlier detection. In this case, the robust approach consistently yielded upper reference interval values that were closer to those of the true underlying distributions. We propose that robust statistical analysis can be of great use for determinations of reference intervals from limited or possibly unreliable data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
A new distribution-free quantile estimator
HARRELL, F. E., & DAVIS, C. E. (1982) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/69.3.635 · Cited by 546
Statistical Bases of Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine
Harris, E. K., & Boyd, J. C. (1995) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781482273151 · Cited by 232
International federation of clinical chemistry
Pannall, P. R., Marshall, W., Jabor, A., & Magid, E. (1996) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0009-8981(95)06205-x · Cited by 155
A Biweight Approach to the One-Sample Problem
Kafadar, K. (1982) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1982.10477827 · Cited by 105
Two-stage transformation systems for normalization of reference distributions evaluated.
Línnet, K. (1987) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/33.3.381 · Cited by 94
A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data.
Boyd, J. C., & Lacher, D. A. (1982) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/28.8.1735 · Cited by 39
A Biweight Prediction Interval for Random Samples
Horn, P. S. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478593 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Cited by
Friedrichs, K. R., Harr, K. E., Freeman, K. P., Szladovits, B., Walton, R. M., Barnhart, K. F., & Blanco‐Chavez, J. (2012) · Veterinary Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1111/vcp.12006 · Cited by 1,293
Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
Ozarda, Y. (2016) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2016.001 · Cited by 264
Reference intervals: the way forward
Ceriotti, F., Hinzmann, R., & Panteghini, M. (2009) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008170 · Cited by 199
Wolfger, B., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Barkema, H. W., Pajor, E. A., Levy, M., & Orsel, K. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-8030 · Cited by 70
Kulasingam, V., Jung, B. P., Blasutig, I. M., Baradaran, S., Chan, M. K., Aytekin, M., Colantonio, D. A., & Adeli, K. (2010) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.05.008 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, P. S., Pesce, A. J., & Copeland, B. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 622-631
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1912628347
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/44.3.622
- The paper
- Horn, P. S., Pesce, A. J., & Copeland, B. E. (1998). A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/44.3.622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.