The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecological Implications of Minilivestock
Abstract
This book provides stimulating and timely suggestions about expanding the world food supply to include a variety of minilivestock. It suggests a wide variety of small animals as nutritious food. These animals include arthropods (insects, earthworms, snails, frogs), and various rodents. The major advantage of minilivestock is that they do not have t
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
Muzzarelli, R. A. A., Boudrant, J., Meyer, D., Manno, N., DeMarchis, M., & Paoletti, M. G. (2012) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.063 · Cited by 694
Food taboos: their origins and purposes
Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-18 · Cited by 448
Edible insects are the future?
van Huis, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665116000069 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2005-01-07
- OpenAlex
- W1009727971
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Implications of Minilivestock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781482294439
- The paper
- Ecological Implications of Minilivestock. (2005). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482294439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
