Cited by 4Speech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRILanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

A Survey of Listener Behavior and Listener Models for Embodied Conversational Agents

Bevacqua, Elisabetta·2013·Coverbal Synchrony in Human-Machine Interaction

Abstract

The usage of multimodal corpora is crucial for studying human behavior as well as modeling embodied conversational agents (Cowie et al., 2010a). Gathering data and creating corpora is complex. Interested readers can read work by Cowie and Douglas-Cowie on the topic (Cowie et al., 2010b) wherein different methodologies for creating corpora are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b15477-11

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of reviews providing a more holistic overview of feedback in human-agent conversation that do not just focus on backchannels and that take both human-agent and agent-human feedback into account.

    “However, we have noticed a lack of reviews providing a more holistic overview of the area, which do not just focus on backchannels, and which take both human-agent and agent-human feedback into account.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Bevacqua, 2013

  • Bevacqua (2009) found that positive and negative feedback can be reliably separated but that signals can be both polysemous and synonymous regarding more specific functions.

    “For the model it was studied (details in Bevacqua et al., 2007; Bevacqua, 2013) which meaning humans assign to these signals, finding that positive and negative feedback can be reliably separated but that signals can be both polysemous and synonymous regarding more specific functions-i.e., users may assign different meanings to the same signal and the same meaning to multiple signals.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Bevacqua, 2013

  • A systematic study of different nonverbal feedback behaviors does not exist yet.

    “A systematic study of different nonverbal feedback behaviors does not exist, yet (but see Bevacqua, 2013 for a survey).”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Bevacqua, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bevacqua, E.
Corresponding author
Bevacqua, Elisabetta
Venue
Coverbal Synchrony in Human-Machine Interaction
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2013-10-16
Pages
243-268
OpenAlex
W2503663930
Cited by
4
References
36
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
listener behavior, embodied conversational agents, multimodal corpus, corpus construction, human-agent interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review