Cited by 17Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Genetic Engineering of Microalgae: Current Status and Future Prospects

Spicer, Andrew, Purton, Saul·2016·Microalgal Production for Biomass and High-Value Products

Abstract

Algae can be cultivated in open or closed bioreactors. Open bioreactors are defined as any reactor that is exposed to the environment. These reactors can take many different forms, but most conform to one of the following broad categories: shallow lagoons and ponds, inclined cascade systems, circular central pivot ponds, mixed ponds, and raceway ponds (Borowitzka and Moheimani 2013). While these ponds are configured differently in terms of their construction, lining, means of propulsion/ mixing, and intensity of management, they all share the common element of being fully exposed to the external environment. Research on how to successfully cultivate microalgae using open systems was initiated in the late 1940s and early 1950s in the United States, Germany, and Japan ( Cook 1950 ; Gummert et al. 1953 ; Mituya et al. 1953 ). While significant progress has been made over the intervening decades, the open pond systems still face serious challenges that stem from being exposed to unpredictable and uncontrollable meteorological conditions, suboptimal mixing within the culture, and exposure to many forms of contamination. These problems limit productivity, nutrient utilization efficiency, and performance stability. Despite these challenges, open ponds continue to be used and developed primarily because they are cheaper and easier to scale, build, and operate when compared to closed photobioreactors (Sheehan et al. 1998; Waltz 2009 ).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b19464-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of basic genetic engineering technologies for key species of microalgae has traditionally lagged behind more established microbial systems such as E. coli and yeast, but the last few years has seen rapid developments in microalgal synthetic biology.

    “Whilst the development of basic genetic engineering technologies for key species of microalgae (e.g. those listed in Table 1) has traditionally lagged behind more established microbial systems such as E. coli and yeast (Ruffing, 2011; Spicer and Purton, 2016) the last few years has seen rapid developments in microalgal synthetic biology.”

    From Cyanobacteria and microalgae in supporting human habitation on Mars (2022) · cites this paper as Spicer and Purton, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spicer, A., & Purton, S.
Venue
Microalgal Production for Biomass and High-Value Products
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2016-05-11
Pages
139-163
OpenAlex
W2432115328
Cited by
17
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.03
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, open pond systems, raceway ponds, photobioreactors, bioreactor design, contamination control, nutrient utilization, algal productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review