CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 189Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vulnerability to stress among women in chronic pain from fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis davis et al. stress vulnerability

Davis, Mary C., Zautra, Alex J., Reich, John W.·2001·Annals of Behavioral Medicine
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2303_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In two investigations, we studied vulnerability to the negative effects of stress among women in chronic pain from 2 types of musculoskeletal illnesses, fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and osteoarthritis (OA). In Study 1, there were 101 female participants 50 to 78 years old: 50 had FMS, 29 had OA knee pain and were scheduled for knee surgery, and 22 had OA but were not planning surgery. Cross-sectional analyses showed that the three groups were comparable on demographic variables, personality attributes, negative affect, active coping, and perceived social support. As expected, FMS and OA surgery women reported similar levels of bodily pain, and both groups scored higher than OA nonsurgery women. However, women with FMS reported poorer emotional and physical health, lower positive affect, a poorer quality social milieu, and more frequent use of avoidant coping with pain than did both groups of women with OA. Moreover, the perception and use of social support were closely tied to perceived social stress only among the FMS group. In Study 2, we experimentally manipulated negative mood and stress in 41 women 37 to 74 years old: 20 women had FMS, and 21 women had OA. Participantsfrom each group were randomly assigned to either a negative mood induction or a neutral mood (control) condition, and then all participants discussed a stressful interpersonal eventfor 30 min. Stress-related increases in pain were exacerbated by negative mood induction among women with FMS but not women with OA, and pain during stress was associated with decreases in positive affect in women with FMS but not women with OA. These findings suggest that among women with chronic pain, those with FMS may be particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of social stress. They have fewer positive affective resources, use less effective pain-coping strategies, and have more constrained social networks than their counterparts with OA, particularly those who experience similar levels ofpain. They also seem to experience more prolonged stress-related increases in pain under certain circumstances, all of which may contribute to a lowering of positive affect and increased stress reactivity over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm2303_9

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Affleck G, Tennen H, Urrows S, Higgins P: Person and contextual features of daily stress reactivity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,66:329–340. · DOI
  2. Mankin, HJ: Clinical features of osteoarthritis. In Kelly WN, Harris ED, Ruddy SR, Sledge CB (eds),Textbook of Rheumatology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1993, 1374–1384.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–188 of 188

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Davis, M. C., Zautra, A. J., & Reich, J. W.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
ORCID
Davis, Mary C.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-08
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
215-226
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
DOI
10.1207/s15324796abm2303_9
OpenAlex
W1561201574
Cited by
189
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
stress vulnerability, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, chronic pain, women, social stress, negative mood induction, positive affect, avoidance coping, social support, knee surgery, stress reactivity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review