The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life
Abstract
PURPOSE: This article presents a model for research and practice that expands on the biopsychosocial model to include the spiritual concerns of patients. DESIGNS AND METHODS: Literature review and philosophical inquiry were used. RESULTS: The healing professions should serve the needs of patients as whole persons. Persons can be considered beings-in-relationship, and illness can be considered a disruption in biological relationships that in turn affects all the other relational aspects of a person. Spirituality concerns a person's relationship with transcendence. Therefore, genuinely holistic health care must address the totality of the patient's relational existence-physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. The literature suggests that many patients would like health professionals to attend to their spiritual needs, but health professionals must be morally cautious and eschew proselytizing in any form. Four general domains for measuring various aspects of spirituality are distinguished: religiosity, religious coping and support, spiritual well-being, and spiritual need. A framework for understanding the interactions between these domains is presented. Available instruments are reviewed and critiqued. An agenda for research in the spiritual aspects of illness and care at the end of life is proposed. IMPLICATIONS: Spiritual concerns are important to many patients, particularly at the end of life. Much work remains to be done in understanding the spiritual aspects of patient care and how to address spirituality in research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887
(1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k · Cited by 7,643
Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432 · Cited by 4,533
The CAGE Questionnaire: Validation of a New Alcoholism Screening Instrument
MAYFIELD, D., MCLEOD, G., & HALL, P. (1974) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121 · Cited by 2,249
Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the virtues
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3300 · Cited by 2,056
Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy.
Bahr, H. M., Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1984) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068915 · Cited by 1,395
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04 · Cited by 1,207
Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E-Revised and Single-Item Scales
Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386745 · Cited by 1,044
Religion, spirituality, and medicine
Sloan, R., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07376-0 · Cited by 846
A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology
Brady, M. J., Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Mo, M., & Cella, D. (1999) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5<417::aid-pon398>3.0.co;2-4 · Cited by 835
Cited by
Puchalski, C., Ferrell, B., Virani, R., Otis-Green, S., Baird, P., Bull, J., Chochinov, H., Handzo, G., Nelson-Becker, H., Prince-Paul, M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2009.0142 · Cited by 1,566
Self-citationPuchalski, C. M., Vitillo, R., Hull, S. K., & Reller, N. (2014) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2014.9427 · Cited by 1,108
Alcohol use disorder relapse factors: A systematic review.
Sliedrecht, W., de Waart, R., Witkiewitz, K., & Roozen, H. G. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.038 · Cited by 358
Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review
Monod, S., Brennan, M., Rochat, E., Martin, E., Rochat, S., & Büla, C. J. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1769-7 · Cited by 338
Rodin, G., Lo, C., Mikulincer, M., Donner, A., Gagliese, L., & Zimmermann, C. (2009) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.037 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Sulmasy, D. P.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- suppl_3
- Pages
- 24-33
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2163828507
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.24
- The paper
- Sulmasy, D. P. (2002). A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.