The Language Factor in Mathematics Tests
Abstract
In this study we investigated the importance of language in student test performance on mathematics word problems. Students were given released items from the National Assessment of Educational Progress mathematics assessment, along with parallel items that were modified to reduce their linguistic complexity. In interviews, students typically preferred the revised items over the original counterparts. Paper-and-pencil tests containing original and revised items were administered to 1,174 8th grade students. Students who were English language learners (ELLs) scored lower on the math test than proficient speakers of English. There were also differences in math performance with respect to socioeconomic status (SES) but not gender. Linguistic modification of test items resulted in significant differences in math performance; scores on the linguistically modified version were slightly higher. Some student groups benefited more from the linguistic modification of items-in particular, students in low-level and average math classes, but also ELLs and low SES students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ELLs face unique linguistic challenges when approaching mathematics and word problems.
“Given the complexities of language, ELLs face unique linguistic challenges when approaching mathematics and word problems (Abedi & Lord, 2001; Yeong & Chang, 2014).”
From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Abedi & Lord, 2001
Abedi and colleagues (2001) identified indices to predict the difficulty of a text, including passive voice constructions, long noun phrases, long question phrases, comparative structures, prepositional phrases, sentence and discourse structure, clause types, conditional clauses, and concrete versus abstract or impersonal presentations.
“Abedi and colleagues (2001) have identified indices to predict the difficulty of a text.”
From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Abedi et al., 2001
Cites
Verbal Factors and Mathematics Learning: A Review of Research
Aiken, L. R. (1971) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/748485 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Algebraic word problems: Role of linguistic and structural variables
Lepik, M. (1990) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf00311017 · Cited by 39 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…Aiken, 1972; Cocking & Chipman, 1988; De Corte, Verschaffel, & DeWin, 1985; Garcia, 1991; Jerman & Rees, 1972; Kintsch & Greeno, 1985; Larsen, Parker, & Trenholme, 1978; Lepik, 1990; Mestre, 1988; Munro, 1979; Noonan, 1990; Orr, 1987; Rothman & Cohen, 1989; Spanos, Rhodes, Dale, & Crandall, 1988).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. L., Zucker, T. A., & Branum-Martin, L. (2019) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.007 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs
Kurz, T. L., Gómez, C., & Jimenez-Silva, M. (2017) · Journal of Urban Mathematics Education · doi:10.21423/jume-v10i1a291 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Given the complexities of language, ELLs face unique linguistic challenges when approaching mathematics and word problems (Abedi & Lord, 2001; Yeong & Chang, 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Abedi, J., & Lord, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Lord, Carol
- Venue
- Applied Measurement in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-234
- ISSN
- 0895-7347 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4818
- OpenAlex
- W2115736634
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Measurement in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- mathematical word problems, linguistic complexity, English language learners, socioeconomic status, mathematics achievement, eighth grade students, National Assessment of Educational Progress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review