Cited by 684Mathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducational Technology and Assessment

The Language Factor in Mathematics Tests

Abedi, Jamal, Lord, Carol·2001·Applied Measurement in Education

Abstract

In this study we investigated the importance of language in student test performance on mathematics word problems. Students were given released items from the National Assessment of Educational Progress mathematics assessment, along with parallel items that were modified to reduce their linguistic complexity. In interviews, students typically preferred the revised items over the original counterparts. Paper-and-pencil tests containing original and revised items were administered to 1,174 8th grade students. Students who were English language learners (ELLs) scored lower on the math test than proficient speakers of English. There were also differences in math performance with respect to socioeconomic status (SES) but not gender. Linguistic modification of test items resulted in significant differences in math performance; scores on the linguistically modified version were slightly higher. Some student groups benefited more from the linguistic modification of items-in particular, students in low-level and average math classes, but also ELLs and low SES students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324818ame1403_2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ELLs face unique linguistic challenges when approaching mathematics and word problems.

    “Given the complexities of language, ELLs face unique linguistic challenges when approaching mathematics and word problems (Abedi & Lord, 2001; Yeong & Chang, 2014).”
  • Abedi and colleagues (2001) identified indices to predict the difficulty of a text, including passive voice constructions, long noun phrases, long question phrases, comparative structures, prepositional phrases, sentence and discourse structure, clause types, conditional clauses, and concrete versus abstract or impersonal presentations.

    “Abedi and colleagues (2001) have identified indices to predict the difficulty of a text.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abedi, J., & Lord, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Applied Measurement in Education
Published
2001-07
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
219-234
ISSN
  • 0895-7347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4818
OpenAlex
W2115736634
Cited by
684
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 38
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Measurement in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
Keywords
mathematical word problems, linguistic complexity, English language learners, socioeconomic status, mathematics achievement, eighth grade students, National Assessment of Educational Progress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review