The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developmental and Behavioral Aspects of Diabetes Management in Youngsters
Abstract
This study examined several developmental and behavioral aspects of diabetes care in relationship to metabolic control in youngsters with diabetes These included the degree to which youngsters assumed responsibility for diabetes care, their adherence with the treatment regimen, and youngsters' and parents knowledge about diabetes Youngsters and their mothers completed a test of diabetes knowledge, mothers rated children's involvement in several aspects of diabetes care, and medical staff rated youngsters adherence with the diabetes regimen Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAI) levels indexed metabolic control Age differences were noted in that older children knew more about diabetes, assumed more responsibility for self-care, but were less adherent with certain aspects of the treatment regimen Preadolescents who assumed greater responsibility for glucose testing and measuring insulin were in poorer control than those whose families were more involved Moreover, among preadolescents, parents' knowledge of diabetes was related to metabolic control but children's knowledge was not In contrast, adolescents diabetes knowledge, but not their parents', was related to diabetes control After controlling for age, duration of diabetes, and level of adherence, it was found that youngsters who assumed more responsibility for charting glucose and eating on time were in poorer diabetic control These findings question the wisdom of encouraging youngsters' responsibility for selfcare without ensuring that diabetes management skills are implemented effectively. This study examined several developmental and behavioral aspects of diabetes care in relationship to metabolic control in youngsters with diabetes These included the degree to which youngsters assumed responsibility for diabetes care, their adherence with the treatment regimen, and youngsters' and parents knowledge about diabetes Youngsters and their mothers completed a test of diabetes knowledge, mothers rated children's...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Katsarou, A., Gudbjörnsdottir, S., Rawshani, A., Dabelea, D., Bonifacio, E., Anderson, B. J., Jacobsen, L. M., Schatz, D. A., & Lernmark, Å. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.16 · Cited by 1,475
Grey, M., Boland, E. A., Davidson, M., Li, J., & Tamborlane, W. V. (2000) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2000.106568 · Cited by 503
Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis
Hood, K. K., Peterson, C. M., Rohan, J. M., & Drotar, D. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0207 · Cited by 347
Clifford, S., Perez-Nieves, M., Skalicky, A. M., Reaney, M., & Coyne, K. S. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.884491 · Cited by 99
Hommel, K. A., Greenley, R. N., Maddux, M. H., Gray, W. N., & Mackner, L. M. (2013) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182999b21 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- La Greca, A. M., Follansbee, D., & Skyler, J. S.
- Venue
- Children's Health Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 132-139
- ISSN
- 0273-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6888
- OpenAlex
- W1964524348
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental and Behavioral Aspects of Diabetes Management in Youngsters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326888chc1903_1
- The paper
- La Greca, A. M., Follansbee, D., & Skyler, J. S. (1990). Developmental and Behavioral Aspects of Diabetes Management in Youngsters. Children's Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326888chc1903_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.