Cited by 66Cognitive Abilities and TestingCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceAging and Gerontology Research

Intelligence, Wisdom, and Creativity: Three Is Better than One

Sternberg, Robert·1986·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

Theory, assessment, and instruction in the field of human abilities have tended to emphasize intelligence at the expense of wisdom and creativity. Were these three abilities indistinguishable, such an emphasis would be understandable and acceptable. But a review of the literature as well as data I have recently col-lected suggest that the three abilities are distinguishable, and that there are im-portant differences among them. Moreover, present measurements and in-struction even of intelligence are to a much narrower operationalization of the construct than would be ideal. It is argued that educational psychologists and others need to give more serious attention to all three of these constructs and their interrelationships. What do we mean when we say that "Einstein was intelligent, " or that "Solo-mon was wise, " or that "da Vinci was creative? " Or, to take some more mun-dane examples, what does it mean to say that "John may be intelligent but he just isn't creative, " or "If only the president's wisdom matched his intelli-gence, we might have averted this mess, " or "My grandfather, a self-educated man, might not have done well on intelligence tests, but he had more wisdom than all Harvard professors combined." In each of these statements, some assertion is made about a person's intel-lectual abilities. Clearly, the intention is to make a different statement about each of these people. Indeed, we know that although Einstein, Solomon, and da Vinci are all renowned for thei…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326985ep2103_2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sternberg, R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Sternberg, Robert
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
1986-06-01
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
175-190
ISSN
0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035851986
Cited by
66
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
intelligence, wisdom, creativity, human capabilities, intelligence testing, creativity assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review