The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Patients' Desires for Communication of Prognosis Information
Abstract
A mail survey was sent to cancer patients to determine how often they want, request, and receive a qualitativeprognosis (i.e., will they die from the disease?) and a quantitative estimate (how long they will survive). The survey included measures of social and psychological characteristics that were hypothesized to be associated with their desire for and willingness to request prognosis information (N = 352). Major findings are as follows: (a) Whereas about 80% of patients wanted a qualitative prognosis, only about one half wanted a quantitative one; (b) over 90% of those who wanted a qualitative prognosis were given one, but only about one half of those who wanted a quantitative prognosis were given one; and (c) about 15% ofthose who wanted a qualitative prognosis failed to ask for it, and over one third of those who wanted a quantitative prognosis failed to ask for it. Multivariate analyses indicate that the effects of education on wanting, asking for, and receiving prognosis information are slight, and the effects of sex are essentially nil. Older people were significantly less likely to request and to be given prognosis information. Those who had greater anxiety and who needed to avoid thinking about death wanted, requested, and received significantly less information. Fear had significant nonlinear effects on desire, request, and receipt of quantitative information. Those whose prognosis was worse were less likely to want, ask for, and receive quantitative information. Those least likely to want, request, and be given qualitative information were those who combined a bad prognosis with a need to avoid thinking about death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880
A personality scale of manifest anxiety
Taylor, J. A. (1953) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056264 · Cited by 3,131
Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient Autonomy
Blackhall, L. J. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530100060035 · Cited by 1,011 · cited 1×
“As Blackhall et al. (1995) pointed out, some people from non-Western cultures who had recently immigrated to the United States indicated far less desire to receive bad news.”
BackgroundDeath Acceptance: A two-Component Formulation and Scale
Klug, L., & Sinha, A. (1988) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.2190/5rlk-w2r0-x241-0jbc · Cited by 56
Cited by
Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S. C., Leighl, N., Mac Leod, C., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.11.138 · Cited by 582
Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Dimitry, S., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi211 · Cited by 504
Cancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. A., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S., Leighl, N., Goldstein, D., Lo, S. K., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.04.095 · Cited by 503
The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.949 · Cited by 398
Enzinger, A. C., Zhang, B., Schrag, D., & Prigerson, H. G. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.61.9239 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplowitz, S. A., Campo, S., & Chiu, W. T.
- Venue
- Health Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-241
- ISSN
- 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7027
- OpenAlex
- W2050651059
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Patients' Desires for Communication of Prognosis Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327027hc1402_4
- The paper
- Kaplowitz, S. A., Campo, S., & Chiu, W. T. (2002). Cancer Patients' Desires for Communication of Prognosis Information. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1402_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.