Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development

Open access
Floyd, Christine, Mehl, Wolf-Michael, Resin, Fanny-Michaela, Schmidt, Gerhard, Wolf, Gregor·1989·Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

This study set out to delineate the Scandinavian Approach to the development of computer-based systems. We aimed to help derive new ideas for human-oriented technology design in other countries. The study is based on the relevant literature, scientific contacts, and two field trips, and covers work in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The study focuses on methodological questions and their theoretical foundations, on explicit strategies for social implementation, and on innovative design illustrated by reference to concrete projects. Though it makes no claim to present a sociopolitical analysis of Scandinavian technology design, the sociocultural background is given due consideration. There is no general agreement among Scandinavians as to whether or not there is a well-defined Scandinavian Approach. We have come to identify such an approach in certain common features shared by the different schools of thought. These include efforts toward humanization and democratization as overriding design goals, in keeping with the aim of building an egalitarian society. The theoretical foundations for the development of computer-based systems draw on computer science, organization theory, and the humanities. Specifically Scandinavian traditions in computer science provide the technical basis for discussions on work design. The most important schools in Scandinavia are the sociotechnical and the union-oriented collective resource approach, each associated with a distinct strategy for societal implementation. The Scandinavian Approach can be seen as a challenge to other countries, combining as it does technical sophistication with the explicit concern for using computers for the benefit of human beings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327051hci0404_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Resin, F.-M., Schmidt, G., & Wolf, G.
Venue
Human–Computer Interaction
Published
1989-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
253-350
ISSN
  • 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7051
OpenAlex
W1980813849
Cited by
247
References
1
FWCI
29.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327051hci0404_1
The paper
Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Resin, F.-M., Schmidt, G., & Wolf, G. (1989). Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0404_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.